Login  Register

Re: SPSS 20 + 64 bit OS

Posted by Rich Ulrich on Feb 06, 2012; 9:04pm
URL: http://spssx-discussion.165.s1.nabble.com/SPSS-20-64-bit-OS-tp5166219p5461332.html

Memory lane?  A competition?

> Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 06:44:22 -0800
> From: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: SPSS 20 + 64 bit OS
> To: [hidden email]
>
> What for crying out loud are you doing which would conceivably require more
> than 16G.
> AFAIK, Win64 can address MUCH more than 16G. It must be your specific
> computers which will accept no more than 16G.
> I remember when PCs shipped with only 16MB.

The first MAINFRAME that I worked on, at my first job (1968), had 32K
of memory, measured in 16-bit words.  The project did not pay
extra to get the 64K version.  This was an IBM 1130. 

It came with 2 disks drives that used platters of about 12 inch diameter,
with plastic cases about 2 inches tall.  Storage per disk was about 5 MB,
as I calculated years later.  There was no internal disk.  There was a
card reader, a paper-tape reader, and a printer (upper-case only) that
ran at 60 lines per minute.  Lower-case did not become widely available
on terminals, etc., until about 1980.

> Before that I recall the old Mac in the lab which had 512K memory.

My first PC was a TI, "IBM-compatible" that cost about $2000.  It came
with 64KB of memory, which I later expanded to 640 KB.  I wrote a
terminal emulator program in Basic in order to connect to a DEC-10
mainframe which allowed 256K (36-bit words) for its maximum job size.
Submitting jobs of 32K assured faster turn-around. 
[snip, previous]

--
Rich Ulrich