Posted by
Maguin, Eugene on
URL: http://spssx-discussion.165.s1.nabble.com/question-tp5599223p5600501.html
Joost,
It may be just how you named your variables and my assumption that 'subjects' are persons but I'm having difficulty understanding how you have a repeated measures design. I don't understand what is repeated. Is var1, var2 and var3 the repeated element within a region or is region1, region2, etc the repeated element for var1. Perhaps somebody else understands this better than I do.
Gene Maguin
-----Original Message-----
From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:
[hidden email]] On Behalf Of joost
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 11:29 AM
To:
[hidden email]
Subject: question
Hi,
my SPSS-file consists of rows and columns (obviously). every row is a
subject and every column is a variable. my subjects can be divided in 2
groups. i have 3 variables that belong to a "region" such that my table
looks like:
region1_var1 region1_var2 region1_var3 region2_var1 region2_var2 ...etc.
subject1
subject2
subject3
.
.
.
etc.
i thus have a between-subjects factor: group and (i think) 1 within-subjects
factor: region.
i would like to do a test that tests whether there is an effect of region
for my 2 groups. this test -if significant- may allow me to
'post-hoc'-assess the regions separately. can this be done using the
Repeated Measures analysis under the General Linear Model?
thanks,
-joost
=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD
=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD