Re: COvaraince not Positive definite for CFA

Posted by Art Kendall on May 31, 2012; 10:57am
URL: http://spssx-discussion.165.s1.nabble.com/COvaraince-not-Positive-definite-for-CFA-tp5713427p5713448.html

I received a "file not found" when I clicked on the link.

What syntax are you using for the CFA?

What happened with the RELIABILITY run? 
Did you do an EFA?  Did that come up with the same problem? If not does the resulting scoring key correspond to the one from the earlier study?

On 5/31/2012 5:00 AM, cicilia wrote:

I am posting the data for the 14 variables here. These are the agg scores of
the subscales and this is what I was trying to analyze. Am unable to get the
original EFA as this is a scale that I havent developed. I need to do the
CFA to establish validity and reliability and to check for equivalence
across cultures.
http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/file/n5713444/variables.sav
variables.sav

Thanks in advance.

--
View this message in context: http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/COvaraince-not-Positive-definite-for-CFA-tp5713427p5713444.html
Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD

===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD