Re: Logistic Regression and Risk Ratios
Posted by
David Marso on
Sep 28, 2012; 9:57pm
URL: http://spssx-discussion.165.s1.nabble.com/Logistic-Regression-and-Risk-Ratios-tp5715330p5715376.html
As he hurls his crystal ball across the room, scaring the sh!# out of his dog , destroying the brand new 90" plasma screen with holographic sensurround. ;-)) and alienating the cat who struts away as if nothing unusual had happened.
Bruce Weaver wrote
IMO, this *is* a very helpful forum compared to many others.
The point Rich made quite clearly, I thought, was that you appeared to be using "relative risk" in a very non-standard fashion. See the Wikipedia page on the RR for examples of how it is typically used.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relative_riskAs you can see there, the RR is typically used in the context of a 2x2 table, not in the context of 23 (or however many) dichotomous variables.
So, IMO the reason you were not getting the answers you were hoping for was that people were still trying to understand exactly what kind of data you had, and what question(s) you were trying to answer. If you want clear on-target answers, you have to provide a very clear description of the problem--and *examples* are often very helpful.
HTH.
Cocoababy wrote
Dear Rich,
Never mind. I figured it out on my own. I hope this is the right forum for exchanging ideas in a helpful thoughtful manner. It doesn't sound like it.
Please reply to the list and not to my personal email.
Those desiring my consulting or training services please feel free to email me.
---
"Nolite dare sanctum canibus neque mittatis margaritas vestras ante porcos ne forte conculcent eas pedibus suis."
Cum es damnatorum possederunt porcos iens ut salire off sanguinum cliff in abyssum?"