Login  Register

Re: Deriving Formula from Ordinal Regression Results to Classify New Cases?

Posted by David Marso on Oct 24, 2012; 5:53pm
URL: http://spssx-discussion.165.s1.nabble.com/Deciphering-from-t-test-the-mean-tp5715819p5715846.html

No worries Vic:
If you go here you can see your post is threaded within a different topic when viewed through Nabble.

http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/Deciphering-from-t-test-the-mean-td5715819.html

Going here : http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/ 

there is a New Topic button.

The reason why this is important are 3 or more fold ...
1.  Your question gets buried under an irrelevant topic and people who might be willing and able to help won't see it.

2.  The Original Poster of the initial topic has their question at the top but a bunch of irrelevant subthreads intermixed in their thread.

3. (My pet peeve):  When responding to questions some people check the box to receive email when someone posts to the topic.  Consequently anyone posting other questions and/or Out of Office Replies (another peeve - Wish the list would just filter them or ban people who only post OORs from posting-).

This might be just idiosyncratic to Nabble archive but AFAIK it is really the best way to view them.  The UGA interface is a complete joke (alphabetical order rather than by date and organized by month)..
--

Vik Rubenfeld wrote
Hi David,

It was inadvertent. I started by replying to a recently received post via email. I removed the sender's email address and thought it was all good. I actually don't know how the threads are identified if not by subject line. Should I start a new thread and re-ask the question? Thanks for letting me know about this.

Best,


-Vik

On Oct 24, 2012, at 5:01 AM, David Marso wrote:

> @Vik and anyone/everyone else that this breach of netiquette applies to,
> PLEASE BEGIN A **NEW* *THREAD RATHER THAN CHANGING THE SUBJECT LINE ON
> SOMEONE ELSE'S TOPIC !!!!!
>
> Vik Rubenfeld wrote
>> What is the correct method for deriving a formula from the results of an
>> Ordinal Regression, that can be used to predict the value of the dependent
>> variable for new cases?
>>
>> Thanks very much in advance to all for any info.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>>
>> -Vik
>>
>> =====================
>> To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
>
>> LISTSERV@.UGA
>
>> (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
>> command. To leave the list, send the command
>> SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
>> For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
>> INFO REFCARD
>
>
>
>
>
> -----
> Please reply to the list and not to my personal email.
> Those desiring my consulting or training services please feel free to email me.
> --
> View this message in context: http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/Deciphering-from-t-test-the-mean-tp5715819p5715833.html
> Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> =====================
> To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
> [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
> command. To leave the list, send the command
> SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
> For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
> INFO REFCARD

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD
Please reply to the list and not to my personal email.
Those desiring my consulting or training services please feel free to email me.
---
"Nolite dare sanctum canibus neque mittatis margaritas vestras ante porcos ne forte conculcent eas pedibus suis."
Cum es damnatorum possederunt porcos iens ut salire off sanguinum cliff in abyssum?"