Re: 95% significance test

Posted by David Marso on
URL: http://spssx-discussion.165.s1.nabble.com/95-significance-test-tp5717562p5717570.html

"ADJUST=BONFERRONI "
--
Without data (even aggregated) no further comment!

mils wrote
Hi,

that's the syntax:

* Custom Tables.
CTABLES
  /VLABELS VARIABLES=subgroup7 subgroup DISPLAY=LABEL
  /TABLE subgroup7 [C] BY subgroup [C][COUNT F40.0, COLPCT.COUNT PCT40.1]
  /CATEGORIES VARIABLES=subgroup7 ORDER=A KEY=VALUE EMPTY=INCLUDE TOTAL=YES POSITION=AFTER
  /CATEGORIES VARIABLES=subgroup ORDER=A KEY=VALUE EMPTY=INCLUDE
  /COMPARETEST TYPE=PROP ALPHA=0.05 ADJUST=BONFERRONI ORIGIN=COLUMN INCLUDEMRSETS=YES  CATEGORIES=ALLVISIBLE MERGE=NO
  /TITLES    TITLE='Table  37:GLOBAL: Biologic population dynamics (last 3 month) - Wave 3 to Wave 6'.


Subgroup: 1,2,3,4,5,6
Wave 1 (Apr-Jun 2010)
Wave 2 (Oct-Dec 2010)
Wave 3 (Apr-Jun 2011)
Wave 4 (Oct-Dec 2011)
Wave 5 (Apr-Jun 2012)
Wave 6 (Oct-Dec 2012)

Subgroup7: 1,2,3,4
New Starters
Switched
Continued
Discontinued

Both single select. Unfortunately, I can't provide data.

Hope it helps,

Mils
Please reply to the list and not to my personal email.
Those desiring my consulting or training services please feel free to email me.
---
"Nolite dare sanctum canibus neque mittatis margaritas vestras ante porcos ne forte conculcent eas pedibus suis."
Cum es damnatorum possederunt porcos iens ut salire off sanguinum cliff in abyssum?"