Login  Register

Using a new good subject line rather than piggy-backing on another topic

Posted by Art Kendall on Jan 23, 2013; 1:05pm
URL: http://spssx-discussion.165.s1.nabble.com/Standardized-vs-Adjusted-Standardized-Residuals-for-Statistically-Significant-Chi-Square-tp5717593p5717603.html

Like many other lists there are archives where people can find out if a similar question has been asked.
The subject line is very important for people searching archives.

Also the subject is very important for threading messages.
People skip messaged they think are outside their expertise or that they think have already been adequately answered.
Art Kendall
Social Research Consultants
On 1/22/2013 5:16 PM, Bruce Weaver wrote:
Todd, when starting a new topic, please do not piggy-back on an old thread --
it louses up the indexing in the Nabble archive.  Your question gets buried
in a thread on some completely different topic, and people who might
otherwise offer you some help may fail to see it.

Here is your question again in a new thread.


Todd Alan Zoblotsky (tzbltsky) wrote
When trying to determine which groups are contributing to a significant
overall chi-square test (for contingency tables that are larger than 2x2),
I have read about using the Standardized residuals (i.e., Standardized
residual values > 2).  However, SPSS also has the option to give Adjusted
Standardized residuals.  I have tried reading up on the Adjusted
Standardized residuals, but am not clear on when (of if) it is more
appropriate to use the Standardized or Adjusted Standardized residuals to
determine differences between groups.  Any clarification or guidance the
group can provide would be greatly appreciated.

Thank You,

Todd Zoblotsky



-----
--
Bruce Weaver
[hidden email]
http://sites.google.com/a/lakeheadu.ca/bweaver/

"When all else fails, RTFM."

NOTE: My Hotmail account is not monitored regularly.
To send me an e-mail, please use the address shown above.

--
View this message in context: http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/Standardized-vs-Adjusted-Standardized-Residuals-for-Statistically-Significant-Chi-Square-tp5717593.html
Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD


===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD
Art Kendall
Social Research Consultants