Re: No variables were entered into the equation SPSS
Posted by
David Marso on
Mar 19, 2013; 6:37pm
URL: http://spssx-discussion.165.s1.nabble.com/No-variables-were-entered-into-the-equation-SPSS-tp5718868p5718882.html
That's the program's way of telling you that there is
no discernible linear relationship between yield and any of your predictors .
A quick check reveals that this is precisely the case.
On the
bright side. You don't have to spend a lot of time writing up the results.
Simple pairwise correlations.--
Correlations
yield
Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed) N
yield 1 13
Mon65 .251 .409 13
Mon60 .222 .466 13
Mon55 .216 .479 13
Mon50 .216 .479 13
Tue65 -.036 .908 13
Tue60 .052 .867 13
Tue55 .072 .814 13
Tue50 .048 .875 13
Wed65 -.189 .537 13
Wed60 .025 .934 13
Wed55 .123 .688 13
Wed50 .228 .455 13
Thu65 .144 .639 13
Thu60 .314 .297 13
Thu55 .430 .142 13
Thu50 .447 .126 13
--
OK: I actually examined the data itself (unusual for me -I'm more of a data butcher than a stats cat, I know a lot about stats but typically I stay out of such discussions because IMNSHO, there is usually insufficient info to justify meddling (without substantial prodding) and mostly my best advice is to hire a qualified local advisor (which I guess is not what people want to hear!-).
In this case it is flat out simple. Nothing to see here.
Eric Black wrote
Did you check whether the listwise deletion causes no valid cases to be left?
Please reply to the list and not to my personal email.
Those desiring my consulting or training services please feel free to email me.
---
"Nolite dare sanctum canibus neque mittatis margaritas vestras ante porcos ne forte conculcent eas pedibus suis."
Cum es damnatorum possederunt porcos iens ut salire off sanguinum cliff in abyssum?"