Login  Register

Re: Meta-analysis for regression coefficients

Posted by Bruce Weaver on Mar 25, 2013; 10:27pm
URL: http://spssx-discussion.165.s1.nabble.com/Meta-analysis-for-regression-coefficients-tp5719057p5719077.html

Assuming you mean you want to do two meta-analyses, one for each coefficient, then the standard methods should work.  See this article by Fleiss for a nice overview of the standard methods:

  http://smm.sagepub.com/content/2/2/121.short

By the way, I found this statement in your post rather odd: "Some coefficients were calculated mathematically and I don't have SDs for those coefficients."  Surely they were all calculated mathematically, weren't they?  Anyway, as the Fleiss article shows, you need to have an estimate of the coefficient for each study and the corresponding standard error (SE, not SD).  If the SE is missing, I think you have two choices:  1) exclude those studies, or 2) estimate the missing SEs.  If you opt for 2, then you should probably run the analysis with a range of estimates plugged in as a kind of sensitivity analysis.  How many of them are missing the SE?

HTH.


Sungeun Chung-2 wrote
Dear SPSS-L experts

I haven't done meta-analysis before but I need to do it now. I am trying to teach myself about meta-analysis and would like to have some wisdom from the experts here.
My problems is that I have results from 16 studies and want to do meta-analysis for two regression coefficients  
My data look like this:

study b1 b2 sample size   coefficients standardized?
S -0.06 0.14 549   unstandarized
P, T, & H1 0.34 0.04 101   standardized
P, T, & H2 0.15 -0.1 129   unstandarized
P, T, & H2 -0.19 0.25 241   standardized
S & D 0.39 0.07 132   standardized
T, R, & C 0.39 0.07 132   standardized
G 0.66 0.31 632   standardized
G & H 0.02 0.24 506   standardized
L & W 0.1 0.13 1335   standardized
L & T 0.25 0.41 232   standardized
M et al. -0.18 0.18 198   standardized
E et al. 0.25 -0.01 359   unstandarized
S et al 1 0.26 0.18 167   unstandarized
S et al 2 0.01 0.37 167   unstandarized
N & F 1 0.26 0.12 152   standardized
N et al 0.09 0.33 520   standardized

Some coefficients were calculated mathematically and I don't have SDs for those coefficients.

Can I find numbers for overall effects for two variables through meta-analysis? 
What are the methods and programs that I can use for this kind of analysis.
Any help will be greatly appreciated!

Thanks in advance,

Sungeun


Sungeun Chung, Ph.D. Associate Professor
Department of Journalism and Mass Communication
40210 Faculty Hall Sungkyunkwan University
53 Myeongyun-Dong 3-Ga Jongno-Gu, Seoul, Korea 110-745
82-02-760-0398; [hidden email][hidden email]
--
Bruce Weaver
bweaver@lakeheadu.ca
http://sites.google.com/a/lakeheadu.ca/bweaver/

"When all else fails, RTFM."

PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING: 
1. My Hotmail account is not monitored regularly. To send me an e-mail, please use the address shown above.
2. The SPSSX Discussion forum on Nabble is no longer linked to the SPSSX-L listserv administered by UGA (https://listserv.uga.edu/).