Well the 25? 26? level NOMINAL variable has absolutely *no business* being in
the REGRESSION in the first place (so, I will assume you will draw your own
conclusions). You would do yourself a favor by researching the relationship
between REGRESSION and ANOVA from a linear models perspective and also write
out the regression equation to acquire some sort of epiphany re the
meaning/interpretation of the dummy variables.
JJEcon wrote
> Thanks for your help, Bruce.-----
>
> As I've already coded the variables (and written about the process), I
> think I'm going to keep them as they are and use the standard regression
> function.
>
> Am I correct in thinking that these 25 dummy variables then replace the 1
> categorical variable in the model and I can now go ahead and run the
> regression? (Sorry- may be a very obvious question)
>
> Thanks again! :)
Please reply to the list and not to my personal email.
Those desiring my consulting or training services please feel free to email me.
---
"Nolite dare sanctum canibus neque mittatis margaritas vestras ante porcos ne forte conculcent eas pedibus suis."
Cum es damnatorum possederunt porcos iens ut salire off sanguinum cliff in abyssum?"
--
View this message in context: http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/Dummy-Coding-Variables-tp5719548p5719554.html
Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |