Re: do repeat

Posted by kwame woei on
URL: http://spssx-discussion.165.s1.nabble.com/do-repeat-tp5719707p5719789.html

Write your code in Word with the autosave interval at 1 min. That will keep the neighbours of your back ;-)

Op 26 apr. 2013 om 21:14 heeft "David Marso" <[hidden email]> het volgende geschreven:

> Well, I guess it's difficult to account for every possibility.
> I would probably use -666 rather than -777 or can we think of something
> worse.
> -666 'SPSS has conjured an imaginary number: We have exited the Euclidean
> plane'
>
> Re Paranoia and computers.
> I had been diligently working on my code for over 2 hrs yesterday (without
> saving -yeah, big mistake-).
> Had my fingers poised over the Ctrl and the S key when all of a sudden
> Windows just went blue screen on me.  TOTAL system crash!  Lost some very
> focused difficult documentation and error handling work.
> I'll bet the neighbors next door (if they were home) were wondering WTF?
> Didn't know we have a sailor living next door.
> (CIT):Computer Induced Tourette's?
> I'm looking for the cure (good thing for everyone I don't work in a cube
> farm).
>
>
> Art Kendall wrote
>> Great!
>>
>>        -777 is very much like
>>            how I end DO IF blocks
>>              else.
>>                  Print / 'OOPS should not have
>>                      arrived here'.
>>                    compute result = -777
>>                      end if.
>>
>>                      remember just because I am paranoid does not mean
>> the
>>                        computer is not trying to mess me up.
>>
>>      Art Kendall
>> Social Research Consultants
>>      On 4/26/2013 1:54 PM, David Marso [via SPSSX Discussion] wrote:
>>
>>     I guess I would revise the value label and make it
>>      even more explicit and diagnostic.
>>
>>
>>      Again, The system could not carry out the projected game plan
>>      -&gt; SYSMIS .
>>
>>      But, upon further reflection, I guess the User Missing has an
>>      upside since
>>      1. You can't assign a VALUE LABEL to sysmis ;-(
>>
>>      2. The variable could be system missing for reasons other than a
>>      zero divide attempt.
>>
>>
>>      I think I shall do some code revision ;-)
>>
>>
>>      VALUE LABELS varlist
>>      &nbsp; -999 &nbsp;'Trapped math error: Attempted Division by 0 :
>> Inspect
>>      (varlist) involved in denominator'
>>
>>      &nbsp; -888 &nbsp;'Unable to evaluate formula: &nbsp;Missing
>> numerator :Inspect
>>      (varlist) involved in numerator '.
>>
>>      &nbsp; -777 &nbsp;'Some other things got screwed up'.
>>
>>      Good Catch Art.
>>
>>
>>      --
>>
>>
>>
>>          Art
>>            Kendall wrote
>>          Much of my time
>>            has
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; been spent on providing
>> just-in-time help of stat
>>            methods, and
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; SPSS.
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; I developed a lot of my soapboxes
>> by seeing how
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; people were shooting
>> themselves in the foot.
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; My use of SYSMIS is this.
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; There is a value for a variable such as
>> the system was
>>            unable to
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; follow my instructions.
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; I use the occurrence of a SYSMIS value as
>> a clue in
>>            going back to
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; find out what was wrong with my
>> instructions (syntax).
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (Over the years I have come to believe
>> that it is
>>            almost always
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; the instructions that are to blame.).
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; I then go back and change the instruction
>> so that they
>>            provide for
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; the special cases that caused the
>> original SYSMIS.
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Hence, in this instance
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; value labels varlist -999&nbsp;&nbsp;
>> &nbsp; 'missing to
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; avoid&nbsp;&nbsp; dividing by
>> zero' .
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; in public policy issues and program
>> evaluation it is
>>            very common
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; to do what in auditing is called
>> "referencing" .&nbsp; This
>>            is a
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; process where another person&nbsp; goes
>> over the whole data
>>            gathering,
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; transformation, and analysis, to check
>> that the
>>            statements made
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; are consistent with what was done.&nbsp;
>> I would not want
>>            legislation
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; or a court case to rely on&nbsp; my
>> statements unless I
>>            exercised due
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; diligence.
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; In addition to redrafting the syntax to
>> provide for
>>            the special
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; cases, I also redraft syntax to include
>> comments that
>>            explain why
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; there are warnings.
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; These go along with my soapbox about
>> readability.&nbsp;
>>            Except for my
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; first few years of using computers, by
>> 1974 or so, I
>>            came to value
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; human factors criteria, such as
>> readability of syntax
>>            and
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; listings, over machine efficiency. YMMV
>> but I find it
>>            much more
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; saving of my time in the long run to use
>> syntax that
>>            explains what
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; is going on.
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; BTW even when I am the only one who is
>> going to see
>>            the syntax,
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; emphasizing readability also helps me
>> when I am
>>            inevitably
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; interrupted during an analysis.&nbsp;
>> Even a short effort
>>            such as
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; replying to a post on this list may be
>> subject to
>>            phone calls,
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; calls of nature, meals, etc.&nbsp; Foe
>> example, I had two
>>            phone calls
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; from my&nbsp; physicians while responding
>> to this post.
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; I also have a soapbox about about
>> carefully
>>            differentiating the
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; different kinds of user missing values
>> including
>>            things like
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 'missing to avoid&nbsp;&nbsp; dividing by
>> zero' .&nbsp; I find this
>>            very useful
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; in the reasoning that the statistics are
>> in support
>>            of.&nbsp;&nbsp; But that
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; is another story.
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Art Kendall
>>
>>            Social Research Consultants
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; On 4/26/2013 10:03 AM, David Marso [via
>> SPSSX
>>            Discussion] wrote:
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Art,
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; What is your concept of SYSMIS and
>> do you think it
>>            should ever
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; remain in a data file?
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Isn't the very essence of system missing
>> an entity
>>            that cannot be
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; assigned a value by the 'system'?
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; I would consider division by zero as a
>> candidate for
>>            treatment as
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; SYSTEM MISSING rather than USER MISSING.
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Interesting, you have been using SPSS 11
>> years longer
>>            than I have
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (1983). &nbsp;
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; However, I did spend 11 years working at
>> SPSS in the
>>            trenches (6
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; doing teksport,5 as a Full time
>> Consultant)- Teksport
>>            was
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; existence in the belly of the
>> beast-answering all
>>            sorts of 'exotic
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; questions' (Macro, INPUT PROGRAM, MATRIX
>> etc -yeah,
>>            all the
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; weirdness that nobody else wanted to
>> touch with a 10
>>            foot pole-
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;).
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; In the early days of my taking on the
>> 'exotic' I
>>            probably learned
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; more from the users calling in than they
>> learned from
>>            me. &nbsp;My very
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; first exposure to macro was someone
>> trying to do:
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; !LET !arg2=!arg1 + 1.
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Well, that had me baffled. &nbsp;Well it
>> is beyond obvious
>>            now, but
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; believe it or not, once upon a time I was
>> a rank
>>            newbie too. &nbsp;
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; I didn't pop out of my mother with a full
>> blown SPSS
>>            manual in my
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; brain ;-)
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; There was even a special folder in the
>> support
>>            database called
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; "Marso Madness". &nbsp;I wanted to call
>> it "Doing Unnatural
>>            Acts with
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; SPSS" but that got vetoed ;-). &nbsp;
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; I LEARNED what I know today by being
>> exposed to all
>>            the weird
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; things 'weird' people try to do with SPSS
>> for 6 years,
>>            8 hours a
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; day. &nbsp;
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; I seriously doubt that support will even
>> consider
>>            answering those
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; sorts of questions any more. &nbsp;Maybe
>> I'll call them for
>>            the heck of
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; it and screw with their minds with some
>> easy but
>>            actual 'how do I
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; do this' question. and see how long it
>> takes them to
>>            refer me to
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; the consulting department ;-)))
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Art
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Kendall wrote
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; I admit it is a
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; soapbox
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; topic.&nbsp;&nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> You surely are not a beginner and despite
>>            having used
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; SPSS since
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; 1972 I still learn
>>            from your
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; posts.&nbsp;
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; However, people who
>>            follow&nbsp; the
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; list or search the
>>            archives
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; are at least
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; to some degree
>>            learners.
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; To aid debugging and
>>            for
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; quality assurance review
>> I
>>            try to have
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; people catch
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; all instances of sysmis,
>>            redraft the
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; syntax,&nbsp; and
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; provide for that
>> condition
>>            in the
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> transformations.&nbsp;
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Then assign a missing
>> value
>>            that can
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; be labelled.
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Redrafting would
>> not be
>>            finished
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; until all
>> sysmis
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; had been changed to
>>            to user
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; missing with
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; value labels
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; for example in
>> this
>>            instance I would
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; put
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; value labels varlist -999
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; 'missing to avoid
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; dividing by
>>            zero' .
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> Art Kendall
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Social Research
>> Consultants
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> On 4/25/2013 1:47 PM, David Marso [via
>>            SPSSX
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Discussion] wrote:
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp;In principle I agree with the sysmis on
>>            right side
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> for the most part.
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> However in this case it is a direct
>>            correlate to the
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; notion that
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> the SYSTEM could NOT carry out some
>>            operation namely
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; an attempted
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> division by 0 (which would indeed end up
>>            as SYSMIS in
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; normal
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> calculations after spewing a host of
>>            warning messages.
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Protecting
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> the division with DO IF will render the
>>            same result.
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;So, my using
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> SYSMIS in this case is deliberate and
>>            significant in
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; reflecting
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> the inability of the system to caary out
>>            the
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; computation.
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> --
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> In MATRIX such an misadventure results in
>>            a fatal
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; untrappable
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> error and SPSS takes its ball and goes
>>            home (end of
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; game), leading
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> to unhappy emails and or phone calls. &nbsp;
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> My shameless hack attempts to capitalize
>>            on the
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; cranked up
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> energizer bunny properties of MATRIX
>>            vector efficiency
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; while
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> gracefully avoiding division by 0. &nbsp;It is
>>            crucial to
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; mop up
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> afterwards internally to avoid ludicrous
>>            results but
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; it is easier
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> than protecting EVERY DIVISION in MATRIX
>>            with the
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; following
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> awkward monstrosity.
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> DO IF (zero_check_matrix).
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> COMPUTE newarray = oldarray / value.
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> ELSE.
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> COMPUTE
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> newarray=MAKE(NROW(oldarray),NCOL(oldArray),0).
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> LOOP #=1 TO NROW(oldarray).
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> LOOP ##=1 TO NCOL(oldArray).
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> COMPUTE
>>            newarray(#,##)=oldarray(#,##)/value.
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> END LOOP.
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> END LOOP.
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> END IF.
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> This also ends up being a PITA because one
>>            must take
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; great care to
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> treat the resulting 0 appropriately in
>>            subsequent
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; calculations.
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp;In the HACK mode one can test for HUGE
>>            values which
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; are
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> distinguishable from 0's which can
>>            legitimately arise
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; from 0
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> numerators .
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> Yeah, there are trade offs, and I am
>>            nowhere near
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; solving every
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> weird thing that can crop up in complex
>>            situations.
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> But, I do stand by my using SYSMIS for
>>            this situation
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; ;-)
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> --
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; Art
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Kendall wrote
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; OOPS! sysmis on
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; right side of
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; assignment operator.
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; RECODE ALL &nbsp;(LO THRU 1.0 =
>>            COPY)
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;(ELSE &nbsp;&nbsp; -999 &nbsp;&nbsp;
>>            = ).
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; missing values all (-999).
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Art Kendall
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Social Research Consultants
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; On 4/25/2013 12:15 PM, Richard
>>            Ristow [via
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; SPSSX
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Discussion]
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; wrote:
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;At 09:43 AM 4/25/2013, David
>>            Marso wrote:
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &gt;If the numbers are all
>>            positive then
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; you can nuke
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; the very
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; small fudge factor
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &gt;and remove the recode.
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &gt;If you have negative
>>            values then you
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; will need to
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; modify the
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; recode (I'm
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &gt;sure you can sort that).
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &gt;RECODE ALL (1.000001 THRU
>>            HI=SYSMIS).
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; I think a cleaner way to do
>>            this RECODE,
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; sidestepping
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; having to
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; choose a fudge factor, is
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; RECODE ALL &nbsp;(LO THRU 1.0 =
>>            COPY)
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;(ELSE &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;=
>>            SYSMIS).
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; But actually, I think the
>>            dividing-by-zero
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; problem is
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; a strong
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; reason
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; to do the computation in a
>>            transformation
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; program,
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; rather than
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; MATRIX.
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; =====================
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; To manage your subscription to
>>            SPSSX-L,
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; send a message
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; to
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; [hidden email]
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (not to SPSSX-L), with no body
>>            text except
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; the
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; command. To leave the list,
>>            send the
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; command
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; For a list of commands to
>>            manage
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; subscriptions, send
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; the command
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; INFO REFCARD
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; If you reply to this
>> email,
>>            your
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; message will be
>> added to
>>            the
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; discussion below:
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/do-repeat-tp5719707p5719720.html
>> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; To start a new topic
>> under
>>            SPSSX
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Discussion, email
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; [hidden
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; email] &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; To unsubscribe from SPSSX
>>            Discussion,
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; click
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; here .
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; NAML
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp;Please
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; reply to the list and not to my personal
>>            email.
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; Those desiring my consulting or training
>>            services
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; please feel
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; free to email me.
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; ---
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; "Nolite dare sanctum canibus neque
>>            mittatis
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; margaritas vestras
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; ante porcos ne forte conculcent eas
>>            pedibus suis."
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; Cum es damnatorum possederunt porcos
>>            iens ut salire
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; off
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; sanguinum cliff in abyssum?"
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; If you reply to this email, your
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; message will be added to the
>>            discussion below:
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp;
>> http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/do-repeat-tp5719707p5719723.html
>> &nbsp;&nbsp;
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; To start a new topic under SPSSX
>>            Discussion, email
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; [hidden
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; email] &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; To unsubscribe from SPSSX Discussion,
>>            click
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; &nbsp; here .
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> &nbsp; NAML
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Please
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; reply to the list and not to my
>> personal email.
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Those desiring my consulting or
>> training services
>>            please feel
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; free to email me.
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; ---
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; "Nolite dare sanctum canibus neque
>> mittatis
>>            margaritas vestras
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; ante porcos ne forte conculcent
>> eas pedibus suis."
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Cum es damnatorum possederunt
>> porcos iens ut salire
>>            off
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; sanguinum cliff in abyssum?"
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; If you reply to this email, your
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; message will be added to
>> the discussion below:
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>> http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/do-repeat-tp5719707p5719750.html
>> &nbsp;
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; To start a new topic under SPSSX
>> Discussion, email
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; [hidden
>>              email] &nbsp;
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; To unsubscribe from SPSSX
>> Discussion, click
>>
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; here .
>>            &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; NAML
>>
>>
>>
>>       Please
>>        reply to the list and not to my personal email.
>>
>>        Those desiring my consulting or training services please feel
>>        free to email me.
>>
>>        ---
>>
>>        "Nolite dare sanctum canibus neque mittatis margaritas vestras
>>        ante porcos ne forte conculcent eas pedibus suis."
>>
>>        Cum es damnatorum possederunt porcos iens ut salire off
>>        sanguinum cliff in abyssum?"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>        If you reply to this email, your
>>          message will be added to the discussion below:
>>
>> http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/do-repeat-tp5719707p5719763.html
>>
>>
>>        To start a new topic under SPSSX Discussion, email
>>
>
>> ml-node+s1045642n1068821h68@.nabble
>
>>
>>        To unsubscribe from SPSSX Discussion, click
>>          here .
>>        NAML
>
>
>
>
>
> -----
> Please reply to the list and not to my personal email.
> Those desiring my consulting or training services please feel free to email me.
> ---
> "Nolite dare sanctum canibus neque mittatis margaritas vestras ante porcos ne forte conculcent eas pedibus suis."
> Cum es damnatorum possederunt porcos iens ut salire off sanguinum cliff in abyssum?"
> --
> View this message in context: http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/do-repeat-tp5719707p5719766.html
> Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> =====================
> To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
> [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
> command. To leave the list, send the command
> SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
> For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
> INFO REFCARD

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD