Re: Box's test warning
Posted by
David Marso on
Jun 13, 2013; 9:50pm
URL: http://spssx-discussion.165.s1.nabble.com/Box-s-test-warning-tp5720700p5720719.html
"Any possible solutions?"
Yes: get rid of the first variable.
This is a situation where 'size' doesn't matter!
The Burl wrote
Can someone explain the consequences of this NPD problem if I move forward anyway and report my Pillai's Trace, F-values, Partial Eta's etc.? Any possible solutions? Is it OK to look at the one-way results individually?
The links were very helpful BTW, thank you.
The Burl wrote
Can someone explain the consequences of this NPD problem if I move forward anyway and report my Pillai's Trace, F-values, Partial Eta's etc.? Any possible solutions? Is it OK to look at the one-way results individually?
The links were very helpful BTW, thank you.
Please reply to the list and not to my personal email.
Those desiring my consulting or training services please feel free to email me.
---
"Nolite dare sanctum canibus neque mittatis margaritas vestras ante porcos ne forte conculcent eas pedibus suis."
Cum es damnatorum possederunt porcos iens ut salire off sanguinum cliff in abyssum?"