Re: A tree based lack of fit test
Posted by
Bruce Weaver on
Jun 17, 2013; 6:17pm
URL: http://spssx-discussion.165.s1.nabble.com/A-tree-based-lack-of-fit-test-tp5720764p5720776.html
In addition to what Mike and Andy have said, see Frank Harrell's post in this thread on the R help list:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Hosmer-Lemeshow-test-td4665115.htmlHarrell is the author of the well-known book,
Regression Modeling Strategies. You can probably find other comments he has made in the Google Groups Medstats group, or on StackExchange / Cross Validated.
HTH.
Cathy Mazzotta wrote
Hi everyone,
I am working on my dissertation and will be doing a multivariate logistical
regression for my analysis.
I have continuous co-variates and a dichotomous dependent variable.
I came across the following reference:
Moons, E., Aerts, M., & Wets, G. A tree based lack of fit test for multiple
logistic regression. The authors compare Tree based lack of fit to
Hosmer and Lemeshow.
Is this an accepted alternative to H & L? I would appreciate any thoughts
the you all may have.
Thank you so much
C. Mazzotta
Doctoral Candidate
UB
Buffalo, NY
--
Bruce Weaver
bweaver@lakeheadu.ca
http://sites.google.com/a/lakeheadu.ca/bweaver/"When all else fails, RTFM."
PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING:
1. My Hotmail account is not monitored regularly. To send me an e-mail, please use the address shown above.
2. The SPSSX Discussion forum on Nabble is no longer linked to the SPSSX-L listserv administered by UGA (
https://listserv.uga.edu/).