Actually I remember seeing plenty of examples of the opposite, people
estimate the coefficients at various quantiles and plot them in a line (plus
area for confidence intervals) for the coefficient at various quantiles
between .1 and .9.
See
Britt, Chester L. "Modeling the distribution of sentence length decisions
under a guidelines system: An application of quantile regression models."
Journal of Quantitative Criminology 25.4 (2009): 341-370.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10940-009-9066-x
Here is a picture taken from Page 360 of the forementioned article
<http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/file/n5722587/QuantReg_Britt.png>
For other online examples see
SAS's procedure -
http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/63033/HTML/default/viewer.htm#statug_qreg_sect033.htm
And some examples from Stata
- http://personal.stthomas.edu/mehartmann/sentencing_disparity_v14.pdf
-
http://www.decisionsonevidence.com/2011/10/wonkish-statistical-tool-choices-make-a-difference/
A cynic might say most articles only report the coefficients for the "most
interesting" quantiles!
-----
Andy W
[hidden email]
http://andrewpwheeler.wordpress.com/
--
View this message in context: http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/OT-Quantile-Regression-Why-not-ranks-or-percentiles-tp5722584p5722587.html
Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |