Re: One-Way Anova Repeated Measures: Main effect is significant, but post-hoc tests are not significant
Posted by
David Marso on
Jan 02, 2014; 10:34pm
URL: http://spssx-discussion.165.s1.nabble.com/One-Way-Anova-Repeated-Measures-Main-effect-is-significant-but-post-hoc-tests-are-not-significant-tp5723746p5723753.html
Then there is always the whole going back to WHY did you do the experiment?
Wonderful thing PLANNED COMPARISONS!
Bruce Weaver wrote
What is the nature of the repeated measures factor? If there is an underlying quantitative variable, polynomial trend analysis may be useful.
JohnDoe wrote
Thanks,
As it was a repeated measures test, I was unable to select any post hocs except for LSD, Bonferroni, and Sidak. I have four levels in my design
Please reply to the list and not to my personal email.
Those desiring my consulting or training services please feel free to email me.
---
"Nolite dare sanctum canibus neque mittatis margaritas vestras ante porcos ne forte conculcent eas pedibus suis."
Cum es damnatorum possederunt porcos iens ut salire off sanguinum cliff in abyssum?"