Re: Negative Adjusted R Square is a "good" thing?

Posted by cynicalflyer on Feb 11, 2014; 8:50pm
URL: http://spssx-discussion.165.s1.nabble.com/Negative-Adjusted-R-Square-is-a-good-thing-tp5724399p5724457.html

Ok, so I ran the correlation matrix of all 37 IVs against each other, combined those significant at the .001 level, and kept crunching until I had 5 IVs left, then ran that. My R Square = .272 & Adjusted R Square = .168, but none of my combined IVs are significant (best of the bunch is .029). Think that will be good enough?