All,
Where is the original post?
Ryan
Todd, when starting a new topic, please do not piggy-back on an old thread --
it louses up the indexing in the Nabble archive. Your question gets buried
in a thread on some completely different topic, and people who might
otherwise offer you some help may fail to see it.
Here is your question again in a new thread.
Todd Alan Zoblotsky (tzbltsky) wrote
> When trying to determine which groups are contributing to a significant
> overall chi-square test (for contingency tables that are larger than 2x2),
> I have read about using the Standardized residuals (i.e., Standardized
> residual values > 2). However, SPSS also has the option to give Adjusted
> Standardized residuals. I have tried reading up on the Adjusted
> Standardized residuals, but am not clear on when (of if) it is more
> appropriate to use the Standardized or Adjusted Standardized residuals to
> determine differences between groups. Any clarification or guidance the
> group can provide would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thank You,
>
> Todd Zoblotsky
-----
--
Bruce Weaver
[hidden email]
http://sites.google.com/a/lakeheadu.ca/bweaver/
"When all else fails, RTFM."
NOTE: My Hotmail account is not monitored regularly.
To send me an e-mail, please use the address shown above.
--
View this message in context: http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/Standardized-vs-Adjusted-Standardized-Residuals-for-Statistically-Significant-Chi-Square-tp5717593.html
Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |