All,
Where is the original post?
Ryan
On Jan 22, 2013 5:16 PM, "Bruce Weaver" <
[hidden email]> wrote:
> Todd, when starting a new topic, please do not piggy-back on an old thread
> --
> it louses up the indexing in the Nabble archive. Your question gets buried
> in a thread on some completely different topic, and people who might
> otherwise offer you some help may fail to see it.
>
> Here is your question again in a new thread.
>
>
> Todd Alan Zoblotsky (tzbltsky) wrote
> > When trying to determine which groups are contributing to a significant
> > overall chi-square test (for contingency tables that are larger than
> 2x2),
> > I have read about using the Standardized residuals (i.e., Standardized
> > residual values > 2). However, SPSS also has the option to give Adjusted
> > Standardized residuals. I have tried reading up on the Adjusted
> > Standardized residuals, but am not clear on when (of if) it is more
> > appropriate to use the Standardized or Adjusted Standardized residuals to
> > determine differences between groups. Any clarification or guidance the
> > group can provide would be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > Thank You,
> >
> > Todd Zoblotsky
>
>
>
>
>
> -----
> --
> Bruce Weaver
>
[hidden email]>
http://sites.google.com/a/lakeheadu.ca/bweaver/>
> "When all else fails, RTFM."
>
> NOTE: My Hotmail account is not monitored regularly.
> To send me an e-mail, please use the address shown above.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
>
http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/Standardized-vs-Adjusted-Standardized-Residuals-for-Statistically-Significant-Chi-Square-tp5717593.html> Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> =====================
> To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
>
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
> command. To leave the list, send the command
> SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
> For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
> INFO REFCARD
>