Posted by
Salbod on
Nov 11, 2014; 2:46pm
URL: http://spssx-discussion.165.s1.nabble.com/proportions-a-b-c-3-vs-d-tp5727795p5727857.html
Hi Gene,
I realized after considerably thought to everyone's responses, how off base my question was. It reminded me of my struggle with the Monty Hall problem.
I have a one sample problem that I needed to model responses to. All my models I came up with (e.g., normal curve) produced significant chi-squares; therefore, I used the rubric that the message had a particular emotional tone if more than half the respondents selected that level. I got agreement between respondents and intent on 32 of 36 messages.
Thanks everyone, Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:
[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Maguin, Eugene
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 4:24 PM
To:
[hidden email]
Subject: Re: proportions: (a,b,c)/3 vs d?
Complete enough information is always better. So was it that students saw/heard the actor deliver the line and then marked which of four options (e.g., 'angry', 'sad', 'joyous' 'disgusted') best described what they saw/heard? Or something else?
Gene Maguin
-----Original Message-----
From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:
[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Salbod, Mr. Stephen
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 4:02 PM
To:
[hidden email]
Subject: Re: proportions: (a,b,c)/3 vs d?
Hi Art,
You're right; I did not express the problem correctly. It is a one sample problem.
-Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:
[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Art Kendall
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 1:05 PM
To:
[hidden email]
Subject: Re: proportions: (a,b,c)/3 vs d?
if the denominator were 550 then the n would be 550. The OP said the n was 2.
Or am I missing something?
Is it in fact a 2-way design?
-----
Art Kendall
Social Research Consultants
--
View this message in context:
http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/proportions-a-b-c-3-vs-d-tp5727795p5727800.htmlSent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD
=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD
=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD
=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD