Posted by
Alexandra on
Jan 06, 2015; 8:46pm
URL: http://spssx-discussion.165.s1.nabble.com/REPEATED-MIXED-MODELS-post-hoc-tests-contrasts-tp5728007p5728360.html
Hello,
For LL1-LL3 the interaction is sign for anx score above 17, and for
LL2-LL3 above 24. I don‘t think I get it why, based on your example
with anx ranging from 1 to 7, if for 1 it‘s not sign then I shouldn‘t
look further :D
The only code that achieves convergence is the one with only the
random intercept and without repeated list length or list length
slope. I'll stick with this then...
For the Johnson Neyman procedure I'll read more from the sources you
recommended. Thanks a lot!
On 12/31/14, Maguin, Eugene [via SPSSX Discussion]
<
[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>
> Replies embedded.
>
> From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:
[hidden email]] On Behalf Of
> Alexandra
> Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 1:06 PM
> To:
[hidden email]
> Subject: Re: REPEATED MIXED MODELS-post hoc tests/contrasts
>
> As you said, indeed the correlations between LSRT and anxiety in LL1 and LL2
> are very similar, hence the plot shows almost parallel lines for these two
> list lengths. Only for LL3 the slope has a upward direction intersecting the
> regression lines for both LL2 and LL1.
>
> You also said this:
> "I also want to acknowledge that I am unsure of whether there are
>