Re: REPEATED MIXED MODELS-post hoc tests/contrasts

Posted by Maguin, Eugene on Jan 09, 2015; 10:20pm
URL: http://spssx-discussion.165.s1.nabble.com/REPEATED-MIXED-MODELS-post-hoc-tests-contrasts-tp5728007p5728402.html

Is a score of 17 a valid score for your anxiety measure?  I assumed you had averaged items and your items had a seven point response format. Thus scores would range between 1 and 7. Go back to the plot you made and mark in the possible anxiety score range. If 17 is inside of that range then an interaction makes sense. But suppose that the anxiety score range was 3 to 15. The highest score anybody could receive was 15. Would it make sense to talk about an interaction that required a person to get a score of 17 or more?
Gene Maguin

---

From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [[hidden email]] on behalf of Alexandra [[hidden email]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 3:46 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: REPEATED MIXED MODELS-post hoc tests/contrasts

Hello,
For LL1-LL3 the interaction is sign for anx score above 17, and for
LL2-LL3 above 24. I don‘t think I get it why, based on your example
with anx ranging from 1 to 7, if for 1 it‘s not sign then I shouldn‘t
look further :D
The only code that achieves convergence is the one with only the
random intercept and without repeated list length or list length
slope. I'll stick with this then...
For the Johnson Neyman procedure I'll read more from the sources you
recommended. Thanks a lot!

On 12/31/14, Maguin, Eugene [via SPSSX Discussion]
<[hidden email]> wrote:

>
>
> Replies embedded.
>
> From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of
> Alexandra
> Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 1:06 PM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: REPEATED MIXED MODELS-post hoc tests/contrasts
>
> As you said, indeed the correlations between LSRT and anxiety in LL1 and LL2
> are very similar, hence the plot shows almost parallel lines for these two
> list lengths. Only for LL3 the slope has a upward direction intersecting the
> regression lines for both LL2 and LL1.
>
> You also said this:
>  "I also want to acknowledge that I am unsure of whether there are
>

---

View this message in context: Re: REPEATED MIXED MODELS-post hoc tests/contrasts
Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD

===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD