Posted by
Mike on
Jul 15, 2016; 11:16am
URL: http://spssx-discussion.165.s1.nabble.com/Non-Equivalent-Control-Groups-Design-Quasi-Experimental-Design-tp5732723p5732742.html
If collecting the data is not too difficult, I would suggest
replicating the experiment -- we are talking about N=27,
right? The key thing would be randomize the people in
the blocks across the images, following the example of
Allan Edwards that I provided earlier. The analysis would
be rather straightforward from there. Moreover, you could
compare the results from the first experiment to the second
experiment to see how much of a difference the randomization
makes in the results.
It is possible that a source like Kirk or some other researcher
has analyzed a design like you have now and has figured out
a way to make sense of the data but this will entail a search
of the literature and evaluation of the methods. This could take
a fair amount of time unless someone knows for sure that there
is (or there is not) another way to analyze the data.
The decision I think you have to make is which of the above
options will take less time to do.
-Mike Palij
New York University
[hidden email]
----- Original Message -----
From: "kat92" <
[hidden email]>
To: <
[hidden email]>
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2016 10:51 PM
Subject: Re: Non-Equivalent Control Groups Design/ Quasi-Experimental
Design
=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD