Posted by
Mike on
URL: http://spssx-discussion.165.s1.nabble.com/Undefined-Mauchly-s-Test-tp5733212p5733214.html
I don't know of any specific procedure(s) for
testing sphericity when
there are more variables than subjects but I
would suggest using the
RELIABILITY procedure to get descriptive
statistics on the two
components of sphericity:
(1) What is the ratio of largest variance to
the smallest variance.
If this number is large, it provides evidence
that sphericity may
not be present (i.e., heterogeneity of
variance). I know that
compound symmetry requires all variances to be
the same but
sphericity does not (the correlation and
variance/SD are involved).
(2) What is the ratio of the largest
correlation to the smallest
correlation. Again if the number is
large, or there are negative
correlations, this would be evidence for lack
of sphericity.
One could do significance testing between the
largest and smallest
variances and/or the correlated correlations
to determine whether
they are "significantly" different but that
will probably depend upon
the number of subjects/cases you
have.
If you can get a sorted covariance matrix
graphic, it could also
help in seeing whether there are patterns in
covariance patterns
(e.g., banding) but SPSS does not provide this
though one could
probably write a macro to do it..
I would think that the presence of any
negative covariance would
imply the absence of sphericity.
If others know of more appropriate tests or
procedure, I to would
like to know. There may be better
general alternatives but the
appropriateness for any actual dataset will
depend upon the
characteristics of that dataset.
-Mike Palij
New York University
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2016 2:20
PM
Subject: Undefined Mauchly's Test
Given
the paucity of information online, I was wondering if anyone knows the
procedural approach to the evaluation of sphericity when Mauchly's test is
undefined, which is the case when the number of repeated levels is larger than
the number of subjects (insufficient df). I am not sure if sphericity can
still be assumed based on the reported values of epsilon larger than 0.75,
whether based on Greenhouse-Geisser or Huynh-Feldt. In one particular dataset,
epsilon is less than 0.1. Presumably it can be assumed that sphericity is
violated when epsilon is that low.
I am aware of using mixed models to
overcome the assumptions of sphericity. My concern is with GLM in this
case.
Citations would be welcome.
=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD