The advisors here seem to be jumping ahead of the measurements.
A paired t-test for year 1 to year 2, for each hospital, will give the 32 averages, per week, for admissions, along with a
t-test whose p-value gives an indication of growth (positive or negative) and how systematic it is. Comparing year 1 to
year 2 seems like an obvious way to present the data, so this is a start. The t-test is useful because you can't readily
say that an "increase of 1.1" per week is as meaningful in a large city as in a small one.
Longitudinal MLM would be the most appropriate choice, observations (timepts) nested within cities. Will give equivalent results to LGM at most basic level.
From: [hidden email]
Sent: 24/10/2016 17:37
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Question about analysis of longitudinal data
===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARDHello everybody!! I'm asking for your kind advice because I have a consolidated weekly data of hospital admissions for the las 2 years (104 observation points) of 32 cities. I'm looking to estimate the mean growth of hospital admissions over this period, but a visual inspection of the data suggest that some cities shows a growth in hospital admission but others has stable records over time (admissions did not vary over time)
My first idea was use LGM, but i have no access to Mplus or Lisrel (I have no licence of this packages), so I want tos ask you suggest me any idea for analyse this set.
Any help or reference will be gratefully received.
Kind RegardsNorberto
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |