Dear List: I am conducting a 2 X 2 X (2) repeated measures (Treatment vs Control, Younger vs Older, Time 1 vs Time 2) analysis with 2 covariates (Body Mass Index, duration of illness). Upon examining the repeated measures effect (Tests
of within-subjects effects) and the pairwise comparisons results I expected the stats to mirror image each other. That is, if the main effect for Time was not significant then I also expected to see that the pairwise comparison between Time 1 and Time 2 to
be not significant. What I find is that the overall Time effect is not significant but the time pairwise comparison output shows that the two times periods are statistically different. The pairwise comparison stats come out under the Estimated Marginal Means
evaluated at the means of the two covariates. Shouldn’t the results be the same? What am I missing.
Martin F. Sherman, Ph.D.
Professor of Psychology
Director of Masters Program: Thesis Track
Loyola University Maryland
4501 North Charles Street
222 B Beatty Hall
Baltimore, MD 21210
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |