Re: Proof 2=1
Posted by
Martin Holt-3 on
Dec 12, 2018; 10:40am
URL: http://spssx-discussion.165.s1.nabble.com/Proof-2-1-tp5737153p5737162.html
Spot on, Mathew!
Martin P. Holt
Freelance Medical Statistician
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.....Einstein
Concise
Encyclopedia
of Biostatistics for
Medical
Professionals
Martin
P. Holt
Linked In:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/martin-holt-3b800b48?trk=nav_responsive_tab_profile
But you are dividing by zero which is a no no when you divided by
(a2 – a.b) since a = b
Mathew Chandler
Computing Consultant-BSS
I.T. Services
University of Windsor
Windsor, Ontario, Canada
N9B 3P4
(519) 253-3000 ext. 2768
[hidden email]
"Beware of false knowledge;
it is more dangerous than ignorance."
George Bernard Shaw
For young statisticians...some festive fun
2a2 – 2ab = a.b + a2 – 2ab
Dividing through by (a2 – a.b) gives 2=1
===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD
=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD
=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD