Posted by
Art Kendall on
Jan 01, 2021; 2:53pm
URL: http://spssx-discussion.165.s1.nabble.com/Historical-query-regarding-SPSS-functionality-tp5740087p5740094.html
There are circumstances where results CAN be different.
From a theoretical and policy perspective, I am a strong believer in
applying the SO WHAT test.
I was interested in hearing about experiences when results WERE or WERE
NOT different in a meaningful way in comparing conventional test results and
exact test results. I.e., for many purposes P LT .055, .050. and .045 are
substantively equivalent.
Similarly, on this list (and in other contexts) people have often worried
whether intervals between values are exactly equal. (To me the question is
whether or not the intervals are severely discrepant.) What I have
suggested is using CATREG to actually test whether there was a substantive
difference in the results under varied level of measurement assumptions.
*To date* I have not heard of a situation when reporting the conventional
interval level assumption results made a substantive difference. To prevent
problems with reviewers, it helps to add a note that the level of
measurement assumption was looked at.
-----
Art Kendall
Social Research Consultants
--
Sent from:
http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD
Art Kendall
Social Research Consultants