Posted by
Alejandro González Heras on
Mar 16, 2021; 4:35pm
URL: http://spssx-discussion.165.s1.nabble.com/Binary-Logistic-Regression-for-Rare-Events-tp5740296p5740307.html
I just opened my eyes twice, if you get my meaning. Thank you very much Art
Apologies for being redundant: when you say CATREG, you refer to the following R package, right?
https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=CatRegIt is true though that categorizing the variable is also interesting, so we can compare those who consider themselves somehow 'immune' (to fake news) versus those who doesn't. I guess it will then depend on the interpretation of the different models, I will run them and compare them. Again, much appreciated Art.
All the best,
A
-----Mensaje original-----
De: SPSSX(r) Discussion <
[hidden email]> En nombre de Art Kendall
Enviado el: martes, 16 de marzo de 2021 16:56
Para:
[hidden email]
Asunto: Re: Binary Logistic Regression for Rare Events
Why do you believe the *residuals* are severely discrepant from normally distributed?
I suggest you try CATREG and see if it makes a meaningful substantive difference in fit with nominal vs ordinal measurement level assumptions.
You might even try continuous vs ordinal assumptions.
-----
Art Kendall
Social Research Consultants
--
Sent from:
http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD
=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD