Posted by
Jeff A on
URL: http://spssx-discussion.165.s1.nabble.com/Multiple-imputation-question-tp5740383p5740392.html
Thanks Kirill,
Although some of the fine points of MI are over my head, I'm a bit beyond
the clear misunderstandings of the poster in that question you pointed to.
It's interesting, however, how many applied researchers do not understand
that MI produces multiple datasets that require a different analysis for
each set and require the combination of their results using Rubin's rules. I
had to explain this to a colleague a few years back since she also was
trying to figure out where she could see the "single pooled dataset." My
question is more of a hypothetical about how one could obtain the best
singly imputed dataset and how that best single one would be different from
using the SPSS MI procedure with the imputations set to 1.
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: SPSSX(r) Discussion <
[hidden email]> On Behalf Of Kirill
Orlov
Sent: Wednesday, April 7, 2021 7:35 PM
To:
[hidden email]
Subject: Re: Multiple imputation question
Jeff, There was a question on Cross Validated
https://stats.stackexchange.com/q/460238/3277 which you might take interest
in.
=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of
commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD
=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD