AW: Aw: Re: !do-!doend question

Posted by Guido Schiffhorst on
URL: http://spssx-discussion.165.s1.nabble.com/do-doend-question-tp5740533p5740557.html

Art, sorry, I've deleted everything not associated with the error from the
macros.
I have a quasi-experimental study and I need to balance therapy lines
between to patient populations following a prespecified pseudo-algorithm in
a study protocol/SAP. I am done but my program could be shorter (and more
elegant if I get David right). I stumbled over that runtime error I've
posted. Thanks to Kirill who solved the issue!
 


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] Im Auftrag von
Art Kendall
Gesendet: Freitag, 21. Mai 2021 16:08
An: [hidden email]
Betreff: Re: Aw: Re: !do-!doend question

I am trying to follow this.  We may have a difference in disciplinary word
usage.

Do you have an experimental or a quasi-experimental study?
You mention a control group, but I do not see any random assignment. Do you
mean a comparison group with similar characteristics?

You have a population of patient records.  Is a different population say a
different hospital?

More specific examples of what you are trying to do might help us help you.








-----
Art Kendall
Social Research Consultants
--
Sent from: http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of
commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD