|
Dear all,
This is just a basic general stats question. Can anyone tell me under what circumstances the Mann-Whitney U test and the t-test for comparing two independent samples would provide different results? The t-test leads to a significant result (reject null hypothesis) whereas the Mann-Whitney leads to a non-significant result. Could this be a violation of the normality assumption in the t-test? Thanks! ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
If the assumptions of the t test are met, it will be more powerful than
the Mann Whitney (under such circumstances, the t test will normally have between 105% and 116% of the power of the Mann Whitney to reject the null hypothesis). If the assumptions of the t test are not met (e.g. by a violation of normality such as you mention), the Mann Whitney test is likely to be more powerful than the t test. So your results are more likely when the t test assumptions are satisfied, not when they are violated. When checking the assumptions, you need to check homogeneity of variance as well as normality. Ideally, do the analysis via the univariate ANOVA function and look at the saved residuals. Julius > Dear all, > > This is just a basic general stats question. Can anyone tell me under > what circumstances the Mann-Whitney U test and the t-test for comparing > two independent samples would provide different results? The t-test leads > to a significant result (reject null hypothesis) whereas the Mann-Whitney > leads to a non-significant result. Could this be a violation of the > normality assumption in the t-test? > > Thanks! > > ===================== > To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to > [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the > command. To leave the list, send the command > SIGNOFF SPSSX-L > For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command > INFO REFCARD > ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
In reply to this post by Charlotte-9
Thanks for your response Julius - helpful information.
I'll have a close look at my data. Charlotte On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:29:58 -0000, Julius Sim <[hidden email]> wrote: >If the assumptions of the t test are met, it will be more powerful than >the Mann Whitney (under such circumstances, the t test will normally have >between 105% and 116% of the power of the Mann Whitney to reject the null >hypothesis). > >If the assumptions of the t test are not met (e.g. by a violation of >normality such as you mention), the Mann Whitney test is likely to be more >powerful than the t test. So your results are more likely when the t test >assumptions are satisfied, not when they are violated. > >When checking the assumptions, you need to check homogeneity of variance >as well as normality. Ideally, do the analysis via the univariate ANOVA >function and look at the saved residuals. > >Julius > > >> Dear all, >> >> This is just a basic general stats question. Can anyone tell me under >> what circumstances the Mann-Whitney U test and the t-test for comparing >> two independent samples would provide different results? The t-test >> to a significant result (reject null hypothesis) whereas the Mann- Whitney >> leads to a non-significant result. Could this be a violation of the >> normality assumption in the t-test? >> >> Thanks! >> >> ===================== >> To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to >> [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the >> command. To leave the list, send the command >> SIGNOFF SPSSX-L >> For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command >> INFO REFCARD >> > >===================== >To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to >[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the >command. To leave the list, send the command >SIGNOFF SPSSX-L >For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command >INFO REFCARD ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
