Since your computer blows up when you try it and you seem to be using
many variables would it be safe to assume you are using large quantities
of data? If so it's entirely possible your logic is correct (I honestly
don't know about that) but that your computer does not have the
computing power to handle that much data and that many variables.
Just a thought.
-----Original Message-----
From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:
[hidden email]] On Behalf Of
Feinstein, Zachary
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 9:51 AM
To:
[hidden email]
Subject: CTABLES - CLABELS ROWLABELS = OPPOSITE With Multiple Response
Data
I am trying to use the following code but it really makes my computer
blow up in a major way:
MRSETS /MDGROUP NAME = $g4a LABEL = "G4a) Technically Advanced Products"
VARIABLES = qg4a_01 TO qg4a_08 VALUE = 1.
MRSETS /MDGROUP NAME = $g4b LABEL = "G4b) Most Confidence and Trust"
VARIABLES = qg4b_01 TO qg4b_08 VALUE = 1.
CTABLES
/TABLE ($g4a + $g4b) [COUNT COLPCT PCT5]
/CLABELS ROWLABELS = OPPOSITE.
$g4a & $g4b are both multiple response variables based on dichotomous
values of response (1/0). I am trying to make it so that the labels
that are common for both $q4a & $q4b appear across the columns rather
than down the rows. I do not think the CLABELS ROWLABELS = OPPOSITE
likes working with multiple-response variables.
Can anyone suggest another option or what I might be doing wrong? Note
that this is fairly simple but my final example will have 14
multiple-response variables instead of just two.
Thank you.
Zachary
[hidden email]
Locked
