Combining variables

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
9 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Combining variables

Salbod
Dear Friends,
                I was given a project with an N=26 that has 28 outcome variables and three stress variables (explanatory). I'm not able to touch the outcome variables, but I will be able combine the three stress variables; here is where I need help.
                The correlations between these variables are: 1 & 2 = .456; 1 & 3 = .157; and 2 & 3 = -.077. Equal unit weighting doesn't appear to be a good idea. I generated a component score using PC. However, I'm not sure if there is a better way of combining these measures.
                Any suggestions (and or references) will be most welcome. TIA.

Stephen Salbod, Pace University, NYC

====================To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Question on 16: production facility

Maguin, Eugene
All,

I just got 16 installed and while I'm certainly not looking forward to it,
there's no choice for site licenses.

My question: in the program listing, there used to be an entry for
'production facility'. There is not now on my installation. The only entry
is for 'license authorization wizard'. I'm assuming the production facilty
hasn't been done away with so how do I now access it?

After looking at the so-called legacy viewer, I noticed that the export
feature has been stripped out. This seems like a rather stupid decision as I
can easily see needing to export chunks of 15 output to a text file. The
other odd thing is why the legacy viewer was not incorporated into the 16
file open output. I don't know anything about the underlying code but it
would seem to be trivial in difficulty. Probably both decisions were driven
by marketing. I'm guessing that 17 is either in production release or late
beta. So, I'm curious, does 17 support 15 and before output files?

Gene Maguin

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Question on 16: production facility

ViAnn Beadle
Go to Help and type Production Jobs into the Index box--you'll find all the
details on how to define and run a production job. Job creation is now
integrated into SPSS.

-----Original Message-----
From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of
Gene Maguin
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 11:49 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Question on 16: production facility

All,

I just got 16 installed and while I'm certainly not looking forward to it,
there's no choice for site licenses.

My question: in the program listing, there used to be an entry for
'production facility'. There is not now on my installation. The only entry
is for 'license authorization wizard'. I'm assuming the production facilty
hasn't been done away with so how do I now access it?

After looking at the so-called legacy viewer, I noticed that the export
feature has been stripped out. This seems like a rather stupid decision as I
can easily see needing to export chunks of 15 output to a text file. The
other odd thing is why the legacy viewer was not incorporated into the 16
file open output. I don't know anything about the underlying code but it
would seem to be trivial in difficulty. Probably both decisions were driven
by marketing. I'm guessing that 17 is either in production release or late
beta. So, I'm curious, does 17 support 15 and before output files?

Gene Maguin

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Question on 16: production facility

Hal 9000
"Command line switches enable you to schedule production jobs to run
automatically at certain times, using scheduling utilities available
on your operating system."

It'd be nifty to know which scheduling utilities we're supposed to use
for, say, Windows XP.
-Gary

On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 11:42 AM, ViAnn Beadle <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Go to Help and type Production Jobs into the Index box--you'll find all the
> details on how to define and run a production job. Job creation is now
> integrated into SPSS.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of
> Gene Maguin
> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 11:49 AM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Question on 16: production facility
>
> All,
>
> I just got 16 installed and while I'm certainly not looking forward to it,
> there's no choice for site licenses.
>
> My question: in the program listing, there used to be an entry for
> 'production facility'. There is not now on my installation. The only entry
> is for 'license authorization wizard'. I'm assuming the production facilty
> hasn't been done away with so how do I now access it?
>
> After looking at the so-called legacy viewer, I noticed that the export
> feature has been stripped out. This seems like a rather stupid decision as I
> can easily see needing to export chunks of 15 output to a text file. The
> other odd thing is why the legacy viewer was not incorporated into the 16
> file open output. I don't know anything about the underlying code but it
> would seem to be trivial in difficulty. Probably both decisions were driven
> by marketing. I'm guessing that 17 is either in production release or late
> beta. So, I'm curious, does 17 support 15 and before output files?
>
> Gene Maguin
>
> =====================
> To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
> [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
> command. To leave the list, send the command
> SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
> For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
> INFO REFCARD
>
> =====================
> To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
> [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
> command. To leave the list, send the command
> SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
> For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
> INFO REFCARD
>

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Question on 16: production facility

Oliver, Richard
XP has built-in task scheduler: Control Panel>Scheduled Tasks

-----Original Message-----
From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Hal 9000
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 1:48 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: Question on 16: production facility

"Command line switches enable you to schedule production jobs to run
automatically at certain times, using scheduling utilities available
on your operating system."

It'd be nifty to know which scheduling utilities we're supposed to use
for, say, Windows XP.
-Gary

On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 11:42 AM, ViAnn Beadle <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Go to Help and type Production Jobs into the Index box--you'll find all the
> details on how to define and run a production job. Job creation is now
> integrated into SPSS.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of
> Gene Maguin
> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 11:49 AM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Question on 16: production facility
>
> All,
>
> I just got 16 installed and while I'm certainly not looking forward to it,
> there's no choice for site licenses.
>
> My question: in the program listing, there used to be an entry for
> 'production facility'. There is not now on my installation. The only entry
> is for 'license authorization wizard'. I'm assuming the production facilty
> hasn't been done away with so how do I now access it?
>
> After looking at the so-called legacy viewer, I noticed that the export
> feature has been stripped out. This seems like a rather stupid decision as I
> can easily see needing to export chunks of 15 output to a text file. The
> other odd thing is why the legacy viewer was not incorporated into the 16
> file open output. I don't know anything about the underlying code but it
> would seem to be trivial in difficulty. Probably both decisions were driven
> by marketing. I'm guessing that 17 is either in production release or late
> beta. So, I'm curious, does 17 support 15 and before output files?
>
> Gene Maguin
>
> =====================
> To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
> [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
> command. To leave the list, send the command
> SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
> For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
> INFO REFCARD
>
> =====================
> To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
> [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
> command. To leave the list, send the command
> SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
> For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
> INFO REFCARD
>

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Question on 16: production facility

Hal 9000
Cool! I just discovered that - thanks.

On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Oliver, Richard <[hidden email]> wrote:

> XP has built-in task scheduler: Control Panel>Scheduled Tasks
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Hal 9000
> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 1:48 PM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: Question on 16: production facility
>
> "Command line switches enable you to schedule production jobs to run
> automatically at certain times, using scheduling utilities available
> on your operating system."
>
> It'd be nifty to know which scheduling utilities we're supposed to use
> for, say, Windows XP.
> -Gary
>
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 11:42 AM, ViAnn Beadle <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Go to Help and type Production Jobs into the Index box--you'll find all the
>> details on how to define and run a production job. Job creation is now
>> integrated into SPSS.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of
>> Gene Maguin
>> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 11:49 AM
>> To: [hidden email]
>> Subject: Question on 16: production facility
>>
>> All,
>>
>> I just got 16 installed and while I'm certainly not looking forward to it,
>> there's no choice for site licenses.
>>
>> My question: in the program listing, there used to be an entry for
>> 'production facility'. There is not now on my installation. The only entry
>> is for 'license authorization wizard'. I'm assuming the production facilty
>> hasn't been done away with so how do I now access it?
>>
>> After looking at the so-called legacy viewer, I noticed that the export
>> feature has been stripped out. This seems like a rather stupid decision as I
>> can easily see needing to export chunks of 15 output to a text file. The
>> other odd thing is why the legacy viewer was not incorporated into the 16
>> file open output. I don't know anything about the underlying code but it
>> would seem to be trivial in difficulty. Probably both decisions were driven
>> by marketing. I'm guessing that 17 is either in production release or late
>> beta. So, I'm curious, does 17 support 15 and before output files?
>>
>> Gene Maguin
>>
>> =====================
>> To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
>> [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
>> command. To leave the list, send the command
>> SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
>> For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
>> INFO REFCARD
>>
>> =====================
>> To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
>> [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
>> command. To leave the list, send the command
>> SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
>> For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
>> INFO REFCARD
>>
>
> =====================
> To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
> [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
> command. To leave the list, send the command
> SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
> For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
> INFO REFCARD
>

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Question on 16: production facility

Hal 9000
Does anybody know what could account for this - when double-clicking a
production file (*.spj) or running one via schedule, SPSS will launch
but the file won't execute. (?)

Here's the syntax file the production job comprises:

* test production job *.
data list free /v1 v2.
begin data
1 1
2 2
3 3
end data.
save outfile = 'c:\temp\production job test.sav'.

Thanks,
-Gary

On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Hal 9000 <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Cool! I just discovered that - thanks.
>
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Oliver, Richard <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> XP has built-in task scheduler: Control Panel>Scheduled Tasks
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Hal 9000
>> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 1:48 PM
>> To: [hidden email]
>> Subject: Re: Question on 16: production facility
>>
>> "Command line switches enable you to schedule production jobs to run
>> automatically at certain times, using scheduling utilities available
>> on your operating system."
>>
>> It'd be nifty to know which scheduling utilities we're supposed to use
>> for, say, Windows XP.
>> -Gary
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 11:42 AM, ViAnn Beadle <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> Go to Help and type Production Jobs into the Index box--you'll find all the
>>> details on how to define and run a production job. Job creation is now
>>> integrated into SPSS.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of
>>> Gene Maguin
>>> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 11:49 AM
>>> To: [hidden email]
>>> Subject: Question on 16: production facility
>>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> I just got 16 installed and while I'm certainly not looking forward to it,
>>> there's no choice for site licenses.
>>>
>>> My question: in the program listing, there used to be an entry for
>>> 'production facility'. There is not now on my installation. The only entry
>>> is for 'license authorization wizard'. I'm assuming the production facilty
>>> hasn't been done away with so how do I now access it?
>>>
>>> After looking at the so-called legacy viewer, I noticed that the export
>>> feature has been stripped out. This seems like a rather stupid decision as I
>>> can easily see needing to export chunks of 15 output to a text file. The
>>> other odd thing is why the legacy viewer was not incorporated into the 16
>>> file open output. I don't know anything about the underlying code but it
>>> would seem to be trivial in difficulty. Probably both decisions were driven
>>> by marketing. I'm guessing that 17 is either in production release or late
>>> beta. So, I'm curious, does 17 support 15 and before output files?
>>>
>>> Gene Maguin
>>>
>>> =====================
>>> To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
>>> [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
>>> command. To leave the list, send the command
>>> SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
>>> For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
>>> INFO REFCARD
>>>
>>> =====================
>>> To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
>>> [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
>>> command. To leave the list, send the command
>>> SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
>>> For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
>>> INFO REFCARD
>>>
>>
>> =====================
>> To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
>> [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
>> command. To leave the list, send the command
>> SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
>> For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
>> INFO REFCARD
>>
>

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Question on 16: production facility

ViAnn Beadle
SPSS owns it but doesn't execute it. To execute it you have to run it from
the command line using the appropriate command line parameters or wrap it in
a bat file containing the command line.

-----Original Message-----
From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Hal
9000
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 3:38 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: Question on 16: production facility

Does anybody know what could account for this - when double-clicking a
production file (*.spj) or running one via schedule, SPSS will launch
but the file won't execute. (?)

Here's the syntax file the production job comprises:

* test production job *.
data list free /v1 v2.
begin data
1 1
2 2
3 3
end data.
save outfile = 'c:\temp\production job test.sav'.

Thanks,
-Gary

On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Hal 9000 <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Cool! I just discovered that - thanks.
>
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Oliver, Richard <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> XP has built-in task scheduler: Control Panel>Scheduled Tasks
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of
Hal 9000

>> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 1:48 PM
>> To: [hidden email]
>> Subject: Re: Question on 16: production facility
>>
>> "Command line switches enable you to schedule production jobs to run
>> automatically at certain times, using scheduling utilities available
>> on your operating system."
>>
>> It'd be nifty to know which scheduling utilities we're supposed to use
>> for, say, Windows XP.
>> -Gary
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 11:42 AM, ViAnn Beadle <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> Go to Help and type Production Jobs into the Index box--you'll find all
the

>>> details on how to define and run a production job. Job creation is now
>>> integrated into SPSS.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of
>>> Gene Maguin
>>> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 11:49 AM
>>> To: [hidden email]
>>> Subject: Question on 16: production facility
>>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> I just got 16 installed and while I'm certainly not looking forward to
it,
>>> there's no choice for site licenses.
>>>
>>> My question: in the program listing, there used to be an entry for
>>> 'production facility'. There is not now on my installation. The only
entry
>>> is for 'license authorization wizard'. I'm assuming the production
facilty
>>> hasn't been done away with so how do I now access it?
>>>
>>> After looking at the so-called legacy viewer, I noticed that the export
>>> feature has been stripped out. This seems like a rather stupid decision
as I
>>> can easily see needing to export chunks of 15 output to a text file. The
>>> other odd thing is why the legacy viewer was not incorporated into the
16
>>> file open output. I don't know anything about the underlying code but it
>>> would seem to be trivial in difficulty. Probably both decisions were
driven
>>> by marketing. I'm guessing that 17 is either in production release or
late

>>> beta. So, I'm curious, does 17 support 15 and before output files?
>>>
>>> Gene Maguin
>>>
>>> =====================
>>> To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
>>> [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
>>> command. To leave the list, send the command
>>> SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
>>> For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
>>> INFO REFCARD
>>>
>>> =====================
>>> To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
>>> [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
>>> command. To leave the list, send the command
>>> SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
>>> For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
>>> INFO REFCARD
>>>
>>
>> =====================
>> To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
>> [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
>> command. To leave the list, send the command
>> SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
>> For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
>> INFO REFCARD
>>
>

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Combining variables

Garry Gelade
In reply to this post by Salbod
Dear Stephen

If the variables can be considered 'formative' indicators you can sum them
to form a scale without worrying about the correlations between them. For
example if the variables measured stress coming from independent sources (eg
work, family) you would not necessarily expect them to be correlated, and
you could add them to get a 'total' stress.  The legitimacy of this
procedure rests on substantive rather than statistical considerations, and
needs to be based on your understanding of the content area, & how the
questions are worded etc.

Regards
Garry Gelade



-----Original Message-----
From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of
Salbod, Mr. Stephen
Sent: 05 September 2008 15:06
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Combining variables

Dear Friends,
                I was given a project with an N=26 that has 28 outcome
variables and three stress variables (explanatory). I'm not able to touch
the outcome variables, but I will be able combine the three stress
variables; here is where I need help.
                The correlations between these variables are: 1 & 2 = .456;
1 & 3 = .157; and 2 & 3 = -.077. Equal unit weighting doesn't appear to be a
good idea. I generated a component score using PC. However, I'm not sure if
there is a better way of combining these measures.
                Any suggestions (and or references) will be most welcome.
TIA.

Stephen Salbod, Pace University, NYC

=======
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of
commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD

__________ NOD32 3418 (20080905) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com

=====================
To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to
[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the
command. To leave the list, send the command
SIGNOFF SPSSX-L
For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command
INFO REFCARD