|
Hi SPSSers,
I have a set of dummy variables with an unequal number of observations in each. I was wondering if anyone knows of a general rule on which category to use as the omitted category. Thanks in advance. Best, Lisa Lisa T. Stickney The Fox School of Business and Management Temple University [hidden email] |
|
Lisa, in Cohen et al (2003) he cites a reference from Hardy (1993) that (1) the reference group should serve as a useful comparison (e.g, control group); (2) the reference group should be well defined and not a "wastebasket" category, and (3) the reference group should not have a very small sample size relative to other groups" (p. 304)..................
given that the partial regression coefficients via the dummy coded vectors use the reference group as the foci for comparison for all dummy coded variables, I tend to use (if there is not control group) the group that I am most interested in comparing to all other categories as the reference group.......... dale y <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi SPSSers, I have a set of dummy variables with an unequal number of observations in each. I was wondering if anyone knows of a general rule on which category to use as the omitted category. Thanks in advance. Best, Lisa Lisa T. Stickney The Fox School of Business and Management Temple University [hidden email] Dale Glaser, Ph.D. Principal--Glaser Consulting Lecturer/Adjunct Faculty--SDSU/USD/AIU President-Elect, San Diego Chapter of American Statistical Association 3115 4th Avenue San Diego, CA 92103 phone: 619-220-0602 fax: 619-220-0412 email: [hidden email] website: www.glaserconsult.com |
|
In reply to this post by lts1
At 11:59 AM 5/30/2007, Lisa Stickney wrote:
> I have a set of dummy variables with an unequal number of > observations in each. I was wondering if anyone knows of a general > rule on which category to use as the omitted category. Thanks in > advance. It's a matter or taste, not necessity, of course; the models are equivalent (in the sense of defining the same space of possible predicted values) no matter what category you omit. I tend to omit the most 'normal' category. That can be the most common category, especially if it's the most common by a large margin: if I'm studying dogs by breed, and 75% of my sample are golden retrievers, golden retrievers will be the omitted category. Or, 'normal' can be based on your judgement: If you think the golden retriever is the prototypical dog (I've sometimes thought that), then you drop the golden-retriever category regardless of how relatively numerous it is. There are other ways to make the judgement, but I'll have to post about those later; I'm muzzy-headed today. Good luck, Richard |
|
In reply to this post by Dale Glaser
Thanks!
----- Original Message ----- From: "Dale Glaser" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 2:26 PM Subject: Re: Dummy variable omitted? > Lisa, in Cohen et al (2003) he cites a reference from Hardy (1993) that > (1) the reference group should serve as a useful comparison (e.g, control > group); (2) the reference group should be well defined and not a > "wastebasket" category, and (3) the reference group should not have a very > small sample size relative to other groups" (p. 304).................. > > given that the partial regression coefficients via the dummy coded > vectors use the reference group as the foci for comparison for all dummy > coded variables, I tend to use (if there is not control group) the group > that I am most interested in comparing to all other categories as the > reference group.......... > > dale > > > > y <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi SPSSers, > > I have a set of dummy variables with an unequal number of observations in > each. I was wondering if anyone knows of a general rule on which category > to use as the omitted category. Thanks in advance. > > Best, > Lisa > > Lisa T. Stickney > The Fox School of Business > and Management > Temple University > [hidden email] > > > > Dale Glaser, Ph.D. > Principal--Glaser Consulting > Lecturer/Adjunct Faculty--SDSU/USD/AIU > President-Elect, San Diego Chapter of > American Statistical Association > 3115 4th Avenue > San Diego, CA 92103 > phone: 619-220-0602 > fax: 619-220-0412 > email: [hidden email] > website: www.glaserconsult.com > |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
