|
Can anyone offer a solution:
The standard output of an ANOVA is pages and pages of stuff, most of which I do not want yet I cannot specify defaults as to which analyses are conducted. Instead I have to go through deleting each separate section again ... and again ... and again. Tables are spread over several pages (width ways and length ways) and to avoid this you have to navigate within several menus .... FOR EVERY SINGLE TABLE. Of which there may be many. Tables cannot be dragged around to maximise the amount of useful information per page (for example in SuperAnova which I used to use and which was WONDERFUL you could drag two tables to be side by side and drag across margins to shrink or extend to squeeze stuff in). I hate wasting paper but I also put some value on my time so why do I have to battle every time I want to print something out to get it down to a sensible printout size? Thank you Barbara Barbara Thew Customer Support Services Computing Services University of Liverpool ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
If you want to eliminate entire tables in the ANOVA output, you can use OMS to suppress them from the Viewer. Or use OMS to suppress all the output and a second OMS request to unsuppress just the few you want. You can also use the SPSSINC MODIFY OUTPUT extension command available from SPSS Developer Central (www.spss.com/devcentral) to hide or delete all tables of designated types after they are produced in case you want to look at them first and then prepare a smaller set of output for printing. (Requires the Python programmability plug-in and at least V17 of SPSS Statistics). The SPSSINC MODIFY TABLES extension command can suppress particular columns or rows in specified tables. It can also set column widths if you want to narrow some tables. You can also reorder the output to put the tables in a sequence you want, although you cannot do side-by-side layouts. The reordering can be done interactively, or it could be automated with a script. HTH, Jon Peck SPSS, an IBM Company [hidden email] 312-651-3435
Can anyone offer a solution: The standard output of an ANOVA is pages and pages of stuff, most of which I do not want yet I cannot specify defaults as to which analyses are conducted. Instead I have to go through deleting each separate section again ... and again ... and again. Tables are spread over several pages (width ways and length ways) and to avoid this you have to navigate within several menus .... FOR EVERY SINGLE TABLE. Of which there may be many. Tables cannot be dragged around to maximise the amount of useful information per page (for example in SuperAnova which I used to use and which was WONDERFUL you could drag two tables to be side by side and drag across margins to shrink or extend to squeeze stuff in). I hate wasting paper but I also put some value on my time so why do I have to battle every time I want to print something out to get it down to a sensible printout size? Thank you Barbara Barbara Thew Customer Support Services Computing Services University of Liverpool ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
Jon's answer will be the most important advice to follow through on, although there is a 2nd action you might consider to cut down on printed pages. Go to Edit ... Options, and consider changing the setting of some of the output to "initially hidden". Often information like Logs, and Text Output are useful, but not desirable to print. This will shrink greatly the gaps in between your tables, and reduce your printout.
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Jon K Peck <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
|
In reply to this post by Thew, Barbara-2
But that’s SPSS user interface people for you – the pits I export to html and re-import to excel and then tidy up Far from ideal, but much better than spss inerface Unfortunately, although saving scripts is good fro analysis it is poor on presentation and abysmal on graphs Best diana On 14/05/2010 12:15, "Thew, Barbara" <B.N.Thew@...> wrote: Can anyone offer a solution: Professor Diana Kornbrot email: d.e.kornbrot@... web: http://web.mac.com/kornbrot/iweb/KornbrotHome.html Work School of Psychology University of Hertfordshire College Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9AB, UK voice: +44 (0) 170 728 4626 mobile: +44 (0) 796 890 2102 fax +44 (0) 170 728 5073 Home 19 Elmhurst Avenue London N2 0LT, UK landline: +44 (0) 208 883 3657 mobile: +44 (0) 796 890 2102 fax: +44 (0) 870 706 4997 |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
