Login  Register

Latent indicator coefficient =1

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options Options
Embed post
Permalink
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Latent indicator coefficient =1

E. Bernardo
298 posts
Dear SEM Experts,

In CFA/SEM, the regression weight of the path from a latent variable to one of its indicators/items is constraint to 1.0 (a user value) so that the other parameters can be estimated.  Can we remove this 1.0, and put it instead as variance of the latent? Any available reference?

Thank you in advance for your comments.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: Latent indicator coefficient =1

Bayram YILMAZ
1 post
Dear Bernardo,
You may want to check MPLUS website and Muthens' explanations on the discussion list.

Bayram


On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:40 AM, E. Bernardo <[hidden email]> wrote:
Dear SEM Experts,

In CFA/SEM, the regression weight of the path from a latent variable to one of its indicators/items is constraint to 1.0 (a user value) so that the other parameters can be estimated.  Can we remove this 1.0, and put it instead as variance of the latent? Any available reference?

Thank you in advance for your comments.



--
"If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research, would it?" Albert Einstein

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
| More
Print post
Permalink

Re: Latent indicator coefficient =1

Ryan
910 posts
In reply to this post by E. Bernardo
Yes. Most SEM textbooks cover this topic. 

Ryan


On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 4:40 AM, E. Bernardo <[hidden email]> wrote:
Dear SEM Experts,

In CFA/SEM, the regression weight of the path from a latent variable to one of its indicators/items is constraint to 1.0 (a user value) so that the other parameters can be estimated.  Can we remove this 1.0, and put it instead as variance of the latent? Any available reference?

Thank you in advance for your comments.