Hi All,
I would like to know the main differences between Excel and SPSS. I think the most of the works can be done using Excel itself, In this case why anyone would like to use SPSS. I have heard SPSS is better ,can do more and everything. So I would like to know what SPSS has which is not in Excel and why one should use SPSS in front of Excel, at least some main points will be good.
This justification will be really a great help for me to learn more.Thank you in advance. With best wishes,
Rajesh M S
|
El 18/04/2012 7:33, Rajeshms escribió:
> Hi All, > > I would like to know the main differences between Excel and SPSS. I > think the most of the works can be done using Excel itself, In this > case why anyone would like to use SPSS. I have heard SPSS is better > ,can do more and everything. So I would like to know what SPSS has > which is not in Excel and why one should use SPSS in front of Excel, > at least some main points will be good. Hi Rajesh: Excel is a spreadsheet, not an statistical package like SPSS. Although Excel has built in statistical functions (many of the of low quality, like the variance, an many distribution functions), you should not use it for serious research. You can find a lot of criticisms to the use of Excel if you Google a bit. Here is one (although not really negative, I have seen some much worser -see below-): http://www.stanford.edu/group/ssds/cgi-bin/drupal/files/Guides/software_docs_excel.pdf The author states: "Statistical data analysis in Excel is not recommended for analyzing datasets with a large sample size or a large number of variables, performing advanced statistical analyses, or for projects in which a number of procedures need to be performed. In addition, Excel requires the data be set up differently than most other statistical software packages (e.g., SPSS, Stata, and SAS). As such, we recommend against using Excel for simple procedures and subsequently using statistical software for advanced procedures. It is more efficient to use statistical software for the entire analysis if you know you will need it for any part of the project" These two reviews should open your eyes: http://www.cs.uiowa.edu/~jcryer/JSMTalk2001.pdf http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~jsimonof/classes/1305/pdf/excelreg.pdf You can read in one of them: "Friends Don’t Let Friends Use Excel for Statistics!" I happen to have studied the subject a lot, because I use Excel, and teach it at the University too, but I have replaced any faulty function by VBA code (surprisingly similar to SPSS MATRIX language, BTW), both mine or written by experts (like Ian Smith's replacement for every statistical distribution function) and I ALWAYS avoid the add-in Data analysis Pack. I tried the demo of the add-in Analise-it, and found it user friendly, but too simple. You can find others, like Unistat, XLStat, QIMacros... I don't know if they rewrote the faulty functions or rely on them. Best regards, Marta GG ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Rajeshms
"I think the most of the works can be done using Excel itself"...
I see you have either 1. put very little thought into this statement, 2. you require only the most trivial of calculations or 3. you don't give a damn about the accuracy of the results... 4. You are doing government work or marketing research? --
Please reply to the list and not to my personal email.
Those desiring my consulting or training services please feel free to email me. --- "Nolite dare sanctum canibus neque mittatis margaritas vestras ante porcos ne forte conculcent eas pedibus suis." Cum es damnatorum possederunt porcos iens ut salire off sanguinum cliff in abyssum?" |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |