A new extension command, STATS CORRELATION, has been added to the Extension Commands collection. With Statistics 22-23 it can be installed from Utilities. It will be posted to the new community in due course. The command differs from the built-in CORRELATIONS command in providing confidence intervals for the correlations. They can be either the Fisher intervals or, if the user has the bootstrap option, the bootstrap intervals. Although this procedure is implemented in Python, I'd like to thank Bruce Weaver for help with this - might ruin his reputation :-) |
Jon,
Why not add to the extension (and later to the core CORRELATIONS) an option to calculate/display population estimates or r either? There have been proposed a number, for different assumptions (just two e.g. mentioned here: http://stats.stackexchange.com/q/148346/3277). 16.07.2016 17:33, Jon Peck пишет:
===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Jon Peck
Jon, not only will it ruin my reputation, it will also greatly reduce the number of citations I might have otherwise gotten for my !rhoCI article with Ray Koopman.
https://sites.google.com/a/lakeheadu.ca/bweaver/Home/statistics/spss/my-spss-page/rhoci What was I thinking?
--
Bruce Weaver bweaver@lakeheadu.ca http://sites.google.com/a/lakeheadu.ca/bweaver/ "When all else fails, RTFM." PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING: 1. My Hotmail account is not monitored regularly. To send me an e-mail, please use the address shown above. 2. The SPSSX Discussion forum on Nabble is no longer linked to the SPSSX-L listserv administered by UGA (https://listserv.uga.edu/). |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Kirill Orlov
I fear they will NEVER add anything more to the CORE anything.
After all we have R and python. Why bother. Fire all the statisticians. =====
Please reply to the list and not to my personal email.
Those desiring my consulting or training services please feel free to email me. --- "Nolite dare sanctum canibus neque mittatis margaritas vestras ante porcos ne forte conculcent eas pedibus suis." Cum es damnatorum possederunt porcos iens ut salire off sanguinum cliff in abyssum?" |
In fact, the statisticians and backend developers are busy with other tasks. On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 12:57 PM, David Marso <[hidden email]> wrote: I fear they will NEVER add anything more to the CORE anything. |
In reply to this post by David Marso
--> Fire all the statisticians.David, are you contamplating SPSS as a free, user-community developed software, like R? Maybe it then becomes only better, who knows. 16.07.2016 21:57, David Marso пишет:
I fear they will NEVER add anything more to the CORE anything. After all we have R and python. Why bother. Fire all the statisticians. ===== ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
Administrator
|
Not at all. It will never be FREE.
Just haven't seen any impressive additions to stats in a LONG TIME. Why bother to add anything like Rasch modeling if there is an extension? Hard to say what I would like to see added but SPSS is about 20 years behind the times. Wondering what the SPSS stats team is cooking up now (per Jon's post)?
Please reply to the list and not to my personal email.
Those desiring my consulting or training services please feel free to email me. --- "Nolite dare sanctum canibus neque mittatis margaritas vestras ante porcos ne forte conculcent eas pedibus suis." Cum es damnatorum possederunt porcos iens ut salire off sanguinum cliff in abyssum?" |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Kirill Orlov
There is a free version called PSPP. But it is woefully inadequate in terms of features if you want anything beyond very basic analyses.
https://www.gnu.org/software/pspp/ https://www.gnu.org/software/pspp/manual/html_node/Concept-Index.html
--
Bruce Weaver bweaver@lakeheadu.ca http://sites.google.com/a/lakeheadu.ca/bweaver/ "When all else fails, RTFM." PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING: 1. My Hotmail account is not monitored regularly. To send me an e-mail, please use the address shown above. 2. The SPSSX Discussion forum on Nabble is no longer linked to the SPSSX-L listserv administered by UGA (https://listserv.uga.edu/). |
Administrator
|
GAG ME WITH A GIANT STICK!!! It is woefully lacking in anything but the most basic stats. Transformation language seems to be pretty complete KUDOS! No Macros, No MATRIX... I could go on. Nice try but hardly a replacement. On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 7:52 PM, Bruce Weaver [via SPSSX Discussion] <[hidden email]> wrote: There is a free version called PSPP. But it is woefully inadequate in terms of features if you want anything beyond very basic analyses.
Please reply to the list and not to my personal email.
Those desiring my consulting or training services please feel free to email me. --- "Nolite dare sanctum canibus neque mittatis margaritas vestras ante porcos ne forte conculcent eas pedibus suis." Cum es damnatorum possederunt porcos iens ut salire off sanguinum cliff in abyssum?" |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |