|
Hellow every body,
'am asking about two things:- 1- how can i get the Odds Ration from SPSS 2- how can i get Logistic Regression. Pls tell me what is the specific steps can i do? many thanks, Okasha |
|
Hi Okasha,
Consider the following variables: Y = a yes/no variable, which is the outcome variable; X1 and X2 are the predictor variables, where X1 is continuous and X2 is categorical. The syntax for the binary logistic regression looks like as follows: LOGISTIC REGRESSION VARIABLES Y /METHOD=ENTER X1 X2 /CONTRAST (X2)=Indicator /CLASSPLOT /PRINT=GOODFIT /CRITERIA=PIN(0.05) POUT(0.10) ITERATE(20) CUT(0.5). Then, the column heading "exp(B)" in the logistic regression output is the odds ratio. You can find in the outputs the B coefficients to form the logistic regression. Hope this helps. Johnny --- On Wed, 12/24/08, Okasha <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Okasha <[hidden email]> Subject: Odds Rtio & Logistic Regression To: [hidden email] Date: Wednesday, 24 December, 2008, 3:05 PM Hellow every body, 'am asking about two things:- 1- how can i get the Odds Ration from SPSS 2- how can i get Logistic Regression. Pls tell me what is the specific steps can i do? many thanks, Okasha -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Odds-Rtio---Logistic-Regression-tp21156112p21156112.html Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD Greetings from Emoticarolers! Create and send a personalised holiday jingle with Yahoo! Messenger today! Try it at http://emoticarolers.com/ ====================To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
In reply to this post by Okasha
Hi Okasha,
Consider the following variables: Y = a yes/no variable, which is the outcome variable; X1 and X2 are the predictor variables, where X1 is continuous and X2 is categorical. The syntax for the binary logistic regression looks like as follows: LOGISTIC REGRESSION VARIABLES Y /METHOD=ENTER X1 X2 /CONTRAST (X2)=Indicator /CLASSPLOT /PRINT=GOODFIT /CRITERIA=PIN(0.05) POUT(0.10) ITERATE(20) CUT(0.5). Then, the column heading "exp(B)" in the logistic regression output is the odds ratio. You can find in the outputs the B coefficients to form the logistic regression. Hope this helps. Johnny --- On Wed, 12/24/08, Okasha <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Okasha <[hidden email]> Subject: Odds Rtio & Logistic Regression To: [hidden email] Date: Wednesday, 24 December, 2008, 3:05 PM Hellow every body, 'am asking about two things:- 1- how can i get the Odds Ration from SPSS 2- how can i get Logistic Regression. Pls tell me what is the specific steps can i do? many thanks, Okasha -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Odds-Rtio---Logistic-Regression-tp21156112p21156112.html Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD Greetings from Emoticarolers! Create and send a personalised holiday jingle with Yahoo! Messenger today! Try it at http://emoticarolers.com/ ====================To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
Hi Johnny,
Many thanks for ur useful interpretation, now could u show me the steps which i have to use to obtain "exp(B)" and and B coefficients , couse i use SPSS 12< but i can't find the correct menu.. Pls Show me the path like ( Analyze>> Regression >> ....) Thanks again Okasha
|
|
Try this website:
http://faculty.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/PA765/logispss.htm Cheers, Johnny --- On Sat, 12/27/08, Okasha <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Okasha <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: Odds Rtio & Logistic Regression To: [hidden email] Date: Saturday, 27 December, 2008, 2:06 PM Hi Johnny, Many thanks for ur useful interpretation, now could u show me the steps which i have to use to obtain "exp(B)" and and B coefficients , couse i use SPSS 12< but i can't find the correct menu.. Pls Show me the path like ( Analyze>> Regression >> ....) Thanks again Okasha Johnny Amora wrote: > > Hi Okasha, >  > Consider the following variables: Y = a yes/no variable, which is > the outcome variable; X1 and X2 are the predictor variables, where X1 is > continuous and X2 is categorical. The syntax for the binary logistic > regression looks like as follows: >  > LOGISTIC REGRESSION VARIABLES Y >  /METHOD=ENTER X1 X2 >  /CONTRAST (X2)=Indicator >  /CLASSPLOT >  /PRINT=GOODFIT >  /CRITERIA=PIN(0.05) POUT(0.10) ITERATE(20) CUT(0.5). >  > Then, the column heading "exp(B)" in the logistic regression > odds ratio. You can find in the outputs the B coefficients to form the > logistic regression. >  > Hope this helps. > Johnny > > --- On Wed, 12/24/08, Okasha <[hidden email]> wrote: > > From: Okasha <[hidden email]> > Subject: Odds Rtio & Logistic Regression > To: [hidden email] > Date: Wednesday, 24 December, 2008, 3:05 PM > > Hellow every body, > > 'am asking about two things:- > > 1- how can i get the Odds Ration from SPSS > 2- how can i get Logistic Regression. > > Pls tell me what is the specific steps can i do? > > many thanks, > > Okasha > -- > View this message in context: > > Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ===================== > To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to > [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the > command. To leave the list, send the command > SIGNOFF SPSSX-L > For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command > INFO REFCARD > > > > Greetings from Emoticarolers! Create and send a personalised holiday > jingle with Yahoo! Messenger today! Try it at http://emoticarolers.com/ > > ====================To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message > to > [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the > command. To leave the list, send the command > SIGNOFF SPSSX-L > For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command > INFO REFCARD > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Odds-Rtio---Logistic-Regression-tp21156112p21181896.html Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD Importing contacts has never been easier. Bring your friends over to Yahoo! Mail today! http://www.trueswitch.com/yahoo-ph ====================To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
Logistic Regression is not available in SPSS base.
You need an add on module in addition to SPSS base to be able to run it. I'm guessing you only have the base module which would be the reason you don't see Logistic Regression in your drop down menu. ________________________________ From: Johnny Amora <[hidden email]> To: [hidden email] Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2008 6:53:49 PM Subject: Re: Odds Rtio & Logistic Regression Try this website: http://faculty.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/PA765/logispss.htm Cheers, Johnny --- On Sat, 12/27/08, Okasha <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Okasha <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: Odds Rtio & Logistic Regression To: [hidden email] Date: Saturday, 27 December, 2008, 2:06 PM Hi Johnny, Many thanks for ur useful interpretation, now could u show me the steps which i have to use to obtain "exp(B)" and and B coefficients , couse i use SPSS 12< but i can't find the correct menu.. Pls Show me the path like ( Analyze>> Regression >> ....) Thanks again Okasha Johnny Amora wrote: > > Hi Okasha, >  > Consider the following variables: Y = a yes/no variable, which is > the outcome variable; X1 and X2 are the predictor variables, where X1 is > continuous and X2 is categorical. The syntax for the binary logistic > regression looks like as follows: >  > LOGISTIC REGRESSION VARIABLES Y >  /METHOD=ENTER X1 X2 >  /CONTRAST (X2)=Indicator >  /CLASSPLOT >  /PRINT=GOODFIT >  /CRITERIA=PIN(0.05) POUT(0.10) ITERATE(20) CUT(0.5). >  > Then, the column heading "exp(B)" in the logistic regression > odds ratio. You can find in the outputs the B coefficients to form the > logistic regression. >  > Hope this helps. > Johnny > > --- On Wed, 12/24/08, Okasha <[hidden email]> wrote: > > From: Okasha <[hidden email]> > Subject: Odds Rtio & Logistic Regression > To: [hidden email] > Date: Wednesday, 24 December, 2008, 3:05 PM > > Hellow every body, > > 'am asking about two things:- > > 1- how can i get the Odds Ration from SPSS > 2- how can i get Logistic Regression. > > Pls tell me what is the specific steps can i do? > > many thanks, > > Okasha > -- > View this message in context: > > Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ===================== > To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to > [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the > command. To leave the list, send the command > SIGNOFF SPSSX-L > For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command > INFO REFCARD > > > > Greetings from Emoticarolers! Create and send a personalised holiday > jingle with Yahoo! Messenger today! Try it at http://emoticarolers.com/ > > ====================To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message > to > [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the > command. To leave the list, send the command > SIGNOFF SPSSX-L > For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command > INFO REFCARD > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Odds-Rtio---Logistic-Regression-tp21156112p21181896.html Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD Importing contacts has never been easier. Bring your friends over to Yahoo! Mail today! http://www.trueswitch.com/yahoo-ph ====================To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD ====================To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
In reply to this post by Johnny Amora
Thanks a millions
Okasha
|
|
In reply to this post by paul wilson-7
Okasha,
Paul is right that logistic regression is not available on the SPSS Base Module. It is available in the SPSS Regression Model. To check if you have licence for the Regression Model, just run the following syntax. show license. Cheers, Johnny --- On Sun, 12/28/08, paul wilson <[hidden email]> wrote: From: paul wilson <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: Odds Rtio & Logistic Regression To: [hidden email] Date: Sunday, 28 December, 2008, 2:36 PM Logistic Regression is not available in SPSS base. You need an add on module in addition to SPSS base to be able to run it. I'm guessing you only have the base module which would be the reason you don't see Logistic Regression in your drop down menu. ________________________________ From: Johnny Amora <[hidden email]> To: [hidden email] Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2008 6:53:49 PM Subject: Re: Odds Rtio & Logistic Regression Try this website: http://faculty.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/PA765/logispss.htm Cheers, Johnny --- On Sat, 12/27/08, Okasha <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Okasha <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: Odds Rtio & Logistic Regression To: [hidden email] Date: Saturday, 27 December, 2008, 2:06 PM Hi Johnny, Many thanks for ur useful interpretation, now could u show me the steps which i have to use to obtain "exp(B)" and and B coefficients , couse i use SPSS 12< but i can't find the correct menu.. Pls Show me the path like ( Analyze>> Regression >> ....) Thanks again Okasha Johnny Amora wrote: > > Hi Okasha, >  > Consider the following variables: Y = a yes/no variable, which is > the outcome variable; X1 and X2 are the predictor variables, where X1 is > continuous and X2 is categorical. The syntax for the binary logistic > regression looks like as follows: >  > LOGISTIC REGRESSION VARIABLES Y >  /METHOD=ENTER X1 X2 >  /CONTRAST (X2)=Indicator >  /CLASSPLOT >  /PRINT=GOODFIT >  /CRITERIA=PIN(0.05) POUT(0.10) ITERATE(20) CUT(0.5). >  > Then, the column heading "exp(B)" in the logistic regression > odds ratio. You can find in the outputs the B coefficients to form the > logistic regression. >  > Hope this helps. > Johnny > > --- On Wed, 12/24/08, Okasha <[hidden email]> wrote: > > From: Okasha <[hidden email]> > Subject: Odds Rtio & Logistic Regression > To: [hidden email] > Date: Wednesday, 24 December, 2008, 3:05 PM > > Hellow every body, > > 'am asking about two things:- > > 1- how can i get the Odds Ration from SPSS > 2- how can i get Logistic Regression. > > Pls tell me what is the specific steps can i do? > > many thanks, > > Okasha > -- > View this message in context: > > Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ===================== > To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to > [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the > command. To leave the list, send the command > SIGNOFF SPSSX-L > For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command > INFO REFCARD > > > > Greetings from Emoticarolers! Create and send a personalised holiday > jingle with Yahoo! Messenger today! Try it at http://emoticarolers.com/ > > ====================To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message > to > [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the > command. To leave the list, send the command > SIGNOFF SPSSX-L > For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command > INFO REFCARD > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Odds-Rtio---Logistic-Regression-tp21156112p21181896.html Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD Importing contacts has never been easier. Bring your friends over to Yahoo! Mail today! http://www.trueswitch.com/yahoo-ph ====================To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD ====================To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD Greetings from Emoticarolers! Create and send a personalised holiday jingle with Yahoo! Messenger today! Try it at http://emoticarolers.com/ ====================To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
Hi Okasha
>> >> --- On Wed, 12/24/08, Okasha <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> From: Okasha <[hidden email]> >> Subject: Odds Rtio & Logistic Regression >> To: [hidden email] >> Date: Wednesday, 24 December, 2008, 3:05 PM >> >> Hellow every body, >> >> 'am asking about two things:- >> >> 1- how can i get the Odds Ration from SPSS >> 2- how can i get Logistic Regression. >> >> Pls tell me what is the specific steps can i do? >> >> >> with the freeware program Winpepi (available at http://www.brixtonhealth.com/). Data can be copy-pasted from SPSS to Winpepi easily. HTH, Mara García-Granero -- For miscellaneous statistical stuff, visit: http://gjyp.nl/marta/ ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
Hello.
I am having some trouble with a piece of syntax that I can’t work out. I have a string variable that is 1000 characters long (all in use). I need to put this info into excel for other officers who do not use SPSS to view. Excel has a limit of 255 characters per cell. How do I split this variable into 4 new variables with 250 characters in each? Along the lines of... Text Variable (1 – 250) = Text1 Text Variable (251 – 500) = Text2 Text Variable (501 – 750) = Text3 Text Variable (751 -1000) = Text 4 EXECUTE. But I need it to work!!! Have tried using Visual Binning (numeric only) and the recode dialogues but am stuck. Could you offer any advice or help please? � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Caroline PETTITT-MORRIS Intelligence� Analyst Greyfriars Police Station Greyfriars Bedford MK40 1HR � E-mail: [hidden email] ********************************************************************** 'Bedfordshire police are now recruiting - visit www.bedfordshire.police.uk for more information ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. ******************************************************************************** Internet email is not to be treated as a secure means of communication. Bedfordshire Police monitors all Internet email activity and content. ******************************************************************************** ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
In reply to this post by Marta Garcia-Granero
Thank you.
This has now been explained. Caroline -----Original Message----- From: Pettitt-Morris Caroline Sent: 29 December 2008 12:37 To: [hidden email] Subject: Creating new variables from a string variable Hello. I am having some trouble with a piece of syntax that I can’t work out. I have a string variable that is 1000 characters long (all in use). I need to put this info into excel for other officers who do not use SPSS to view. Excel has a limit of 255 characters per cell. How do I split this variable into 4 new variables with 250 characters in each? Along the lines of... Text Variable (1 – 250) = Text1 Text Variable (251 – 500) = Text2 Text Variable (501 – 750) = Text3 Text Variable (751 -1000) = Text 4 EXECUTE. But I need it to work!!! Have tried using Visual Binning (numeric only) and the recode dialogues but am stuck. Could you offer any advice or help please? � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Caroline PETTITT-MORRIS Intelligence� Analyst Greyfriars Police Station Greyfriars Bedford MK40 1HR � E-mail: [hidden email] ********************************************************************** 'Bedfordshire police are now recruiting - visit www.bedfordshire.police.uk for more information ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. ******************************************************************************** Internet email is not to be treated as a secure means of communication. Bedfordshire Police monitors all Internet email activity and content. ******************************************************************************** ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
Hi
The following syntax should do this, if I have understood your question correctly. * bigstring is the original 1000 char string variable. *---------------------------------------. STRING unpack1 unpack2 unpack3 unpack4 (A250). COMPUTE unpack1 = SUBSTR(bigstring,1,250) . COMPUTE unpack2 = SUBSTR(bigstring,251,500) . COMPUTE unpack3 = SUBSTR(bigstring,501,750) . COMPUTE unpack4 = SUBSTR(bigstring,751,1000) . EXECUTE . Regards Clive On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 12:36:56 -0000, Pettitt-Morris Caroline <[hidden email]> wrote: >Hello. > >I am having some trouble with a piece of syntax that I canât work out. > >I have a string variable that is 1000 characters long (all in use). >I need to put this info into excel for other officers who do not use SPSS to view. >Excel has a limit of 255 characters per cell. > >How do I split this variable into 4 new variables with 250 characters in each? > >Along the lines of... > >Text Variable (1 â 250) = Text1 >Text Variable (251 â 500) = Text2 >Text Variable (501 â 750) = Text3 >Text Variable (751 -1000) = Text 4 >EXECUTE. > >But I need it to work!!! > >Have tried using Visual Binning (numeric only) and the recode dialogues > >Could you offer any advice or help please? >                                                                               >Caroline PETTITT-MORRIS >Intelligence Analyst >Greyfriars Police Station >Greyfriars >Bedford >MK40 1HR ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
In reply to this post by Johnny Amora
Dear List,
I appreciate your patience with this non-SPSS question.
From a practical standpoint, what is the consequence of conducting a statistical test comparing means or frequencies when one data set is weighted and the other is not (data has been subsetted so weights are no longer accurate).
Thank you,
John |
|
Hi John, I think that would depend on how the weight is calculated. If the weight affects your effective N then you might be comparing two populations with different sample sizes, in which case one mean (for the larger sample) is more trustworthy than the other (smaller sample). This should affect your conclusion only minimally, as long the smaller sample size is adequate enough.
If the weight affects only your beta coefficients, then this should not influence your mean or frequency calculations.
Hope this helps,
Neda From: J P <[hidden email]> To: [hidden email] Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 10:45:54 AM Subject: comparing weighted data to unweighted data Dear List,
I appreciate your patience with this non-SPSS question.
From a practical standpoint, what is the consequence of conducting a statistical test comparing means or frequencies when one data set is weighted and the other is not (data has been subsetted so weights are no longer accurate).
Thank you,
John |
|
In reply to this post by J P-6
Several consequences. First, if the
weights were “inflationary”,
i.e. they amplify sample size to the size of the population, SPSS would
consider the expanded size as the size of the sample, and compute significance
accordingly (thus overstating the significance of results). Besides, if different
cases have different weights (i.e. weights are correcting proportions in the
sample to proportions in the population), using the unweighted set gives some
cases more weight than they deserve, and other cases less, again distorting the
results. I do not understand your
remark about weights being no Langer achúrate because the data have been
subsetted. If you have N cases, each with a weight, and you take one subset of M
cases (M<N), you can still use the weights. For instance, súpose you
extract a sample of 1000 from a population, with a complex sampling design
mandating that each case has a specific weight in the sample; your weighted
sample would yield results representative of the referente population. Then suppose
you select one subset consisting of about one half of the samle (say, just all the
males): if you keep the weights, your subset would represent the
characteristics of the male population, just as the entire sample represented
the entire population of both sexes. Hector. From: SPSSX(r)
Discussion Dear List, I appreciate your patience with this non-SPSS question. From a practical standpoint, what is the consequence
of conducting a statistical test comparing means or frequencies when
one data set is weighted and the other is not (data has been subsetted so
weights are no longer accurate). Thank you, John |
|
Dear Hector and Neda,
Thank you so much for responding (Hector, I am in the process of reading your paper on weighting).
Here is the situation I am dealing with: I work at a small college and we have NSSE (http://nsse.iub.edu/index.cfm) data that departments would like to use to make comparisons between themself and the rest of the college, our Carnegie peer group, and NSSE as a whole. For the Carnegie and NSSE groups all I have are weighted frequencies, means, SDs, and Ns from a summary report.
Is it legitimate for departments to perform t-tests comparing their unweighted department data to the college-minus-department, Carnegie and NSSE groups? The response rate is around 30% for my college. The NSSE weight is based on status and gender which I believe makes them 'proportional' weights. My college has only full-time students and is about 90% male, so the weight variable tends to hover around 1. The department n = about 25, college n about 200, Caregie n = about 35,000, NSSE n = about 300,000.
I have an economist and engineer who say it's perfectly fine, however I do not understand the complexities and am hesitant to give my blessings. I know I should pose this question to NSSE, but am trying to first educate myself a little.
Thanks again!
From: Hector Maletta <[hidden email]> To: J P <[hidden email]>; [hidden email] Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 11:08:15 AM Subject: RE: comparing weighted data to unweighted data Several consequences. First, if the weights were “inflationary”, i.e. they amplify sample size to the size of the population, SPSS would consider the expanded size as the size of the sample, and compute significance accordingly (thus overstating the significance of results). Besides, if different cases have different weights (i.e. weights are correcting proportions in the sample to proportions in the population), using the unweighted set gives some cases more weight than they deserve, and other cases less, again distorting the results. I do not understand your remark about weights being no Langer achúrate because the data have been subsetted. If you have N cases, each with a weight, and you take one subset of M cases (M<N), you can still use the weights. For instance, súpose you extract a sample of 1000 from a population, with a complex sampling design mandating that each case has a specific weight in the sample; your weighted sample would yield results representative of the referente population. Then suppose you select one subset consisting of about one half of the samle (say, just all the males): if you keep the weights, your subset would represent the characteristics of the male population, just as the entire sample represented the entire population of both sexes.
Hector.
From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of J P
Dear List,
I appreciate your patience with this non-SPSS question.
From a practical standpoint, what is the consequence of conducting a statistical test comparing means or frequencies when one data set is weighted and the other is not (data has been subsetted so weights are no longer accurate).
Thank you, John
|
Hope
this helps. Hector From: SPSSX(r)
Discussion Dear Hector and Neda, Thank you so much for responding (Hector, I am in the process of
reading your paper on weighting). Here is the situation I am dealing with: I work at a small college
and we have NSSE (http://nsse.iub.edu/index.cfm) data
that departments would like to use to make comparisons between themself
and the rest of the college, our Carnegie peer group, and NSSE as a
whole. For the Carnegie and NSSE groups all I have are weighted
frequencies, means, SDs, and Ns from a summary report. Is it legitimate for departments to perform t-tests comparing their
unweighted department data to the college-minus-department, Carnegie and NSSE
groups? The response rate is around 30% for my college. The NSSE weight
is based on status and gender which I believe makes
them 'proportional' weights. My college has only full-time students
and is about 90% male, so the weight variable tends to hover around 1. The
department n = about 25, college n about 200, Caregie n = about 35,000, NSSE n
= about 300,000. I have an economist and engineer who say it's perfectly fine, however I
do not understand the complexities and am hesitant to give my blessings. I know
I should pose this question to NSSE, but am trying to first educate myself a
little. Thanks again!
From: Hector
Maletta <[hidden email]> Several consequences. First, if the
weights were “inflationary”,
i.e. they amplify sample size to the size of the population, SPSS would
consider the expanded size as the size of the sample, and compute significance
accordingly (thus overstating the significance of results). Besides, if
different cases have different weights (i.e. weights are correcting proportions
in the sample to proportions in the population), using the unweighted set gives
some cases more weight than they deserve, and other cases less, again
distorting the results. I do not understand your
remark about weights being no Langer achúrate because the data have been
subsetted. If you have N cases, each with a weight, and you take one subset of
M cases (M<N), you can still use the weights. For instance, súpose you
extract a sample of 1000 from a population, with a complex sampling design
mandating that each case has a specific weight in the sample; your weighted
sample would yield results representative of the referente population. Then
suppose you select one subset consisting of about one half of the samle (say,
just all the males): if you keep the weights, your subset would represent the
characteristics of the male population, just as the entire sample represented
the entire population of both sexes. Hector. From: SPSSX(r)
Discussion Dear List, I appreciate your patience with this non-SPSS question. From a practical standpoint, what is the consequence
of conducting a statistical test comparing means or frequencies when
one data set is weighted and the other is not (data has been subsetted so
weights are no longer accurate). Thank you, John |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
