Hello SPSS'ers:
I have two variables, independent (types of learning; 4 types) and one independent variable (understanding scores). I wanna investigate the effect of those 4 types of learning on the understanding. Which analysis would be appropriate in this regard? One-way or two-way ANOVA? Please advise. Thanks alot Ahmed --------------------------------- Check out the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. |
Ahmed,
In answering this question, I am assuming that your four types of learning represent mutually exclusive categories (i.e., subjects can appear in only one category), and that your dependent variable is an interval-level measure with a fairly normal distribution and consistent variance in each of the four categories. If the four categories represent combinations of two dimensions (i.e., Hi/Lo on Dimension A crossed with Hi/Lo on Dimension B), then your should be looking at a 2 by 2 two-way ANOVA. If the four categories simply represent mutually exclusive categories, then look at a one-way ANOVA. HTH, Stephen Brand For personalized and professional consultation in statistics and research design, visit www.statisticsdoc.com -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]]On Behalf Of SPSS SPSS Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2007 7:02 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: Problem with ANOVA Hello SPSS'ers: I have two variables, independent (types of learning; 4 types) and one independent variable (understanding scores). I wanna investigate the effect of those 4 types of learning on the understanding. Which analysis would be appropriate in this regard? One-way or two-way ANOVA? Please advise. Thanks alot Ahmed --------------------------------- Check out the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. |
In reply to this post by SPSS SPSS
Ahmed,
Now that I have seen the variables, it appears that the four learning types are actually scores on four distinct variables, representing different learning styles. This changes the nature of the analysis considerably. You should consider correlation and regression. It would be possible to conduct a one-way ANOVA, classifying subjects by their highest score on the four learning variables, but this approach would lose a lot of information (e.g., it does not distinguish between people who are slightly higher on one of the four learning styles from those who are a lot higher on one of the styles. Can you tell us a little more about your research questions and hypotheses? HTH, Stephen Brand For personalized and professional consultation in statistics and research design, visit www.statisticsdoc.com -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]]On Behalf Of SPSS SPSS Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2007 7:02 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: Problem with ANOVA Hello SPSS'ers: I have two variables, independent (types of learning; 4 types) and one independent variable (understanding scores). I wanna investigate the effect of those 4 types of learning on the understanding. Which analysis would be appropriate in this regard? One-way or two-way ANOVA? Please advise. Thanks alot Ahmed --------------------------------- Check out the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. |
In reply to this post by SPSS SPSS
You could use one way anova if you choose to ignore the teachers under
each method. You could also include the schools where the teaching took place. If you include either one of those two factors in the analysis they could be considered as random factors. As an example I developed an experiment where I measured the effects of two cleaner products on tile grout. Having two people applying the treatments required that the applicators be introduced as random factors. -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Statisticsdoc Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 6:52 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: Problem with ANOVA Ahmed, Now that I have seen the variables, it appears that the four learning types are actually scores on four distinct variables, representing different learning styles. This changes the nature of the analysis considerably. You should consider correlation and regression. It would be possible to conduct a one-way ANOVA, classifying subjects by their highest score on the four learning variables, but this approach would lose a lot of information (e.g., it does not distinguish between people who are slightly higher on one of the four learning styles from those who are a lot higher on one of the styles. Can you tell us a little more about your research questions and hypotheses? HTH, Stephen Brand For personalized and professional consultation in statistics and research design, visit www.statisticsdoc.com -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]]On Behalf Of SPSS SPSS Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2007 7:02 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: Problem with ANOVA Hello SPSS'ers: I have two variables, independent (types of learning; 4 types) and one independent variable (understanding scores). I wanna investigate the effect of those 4 types of learning on the understanding. Which analysis would be appropriate in this regard? One-way or two-way ANOVA? Please advise. Thanks alot Ahmed --------------------------------- Check out the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster. NOTICE: This e-mail (and any attachments) may contain PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL information and is intended only for the use of the specific individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It may contain information that is privileged and confidential under state and federal law. This information may be used or disclosed only in accordance with law, and you may be subject to penalties under law for improper use or further disclosure of the information in this e-mail and its attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the person named above by reply e-mail, and then delete the original e-mail. Thank you. |
Hello,
I send this off topic question a view days ago to the list. Some people asked for clarrification, therefore I rephrased my question. Who can help me with my off topic question. A sample was analyzed x (for e.g., 15) times. I used the descriptive funtion to calculate the mean and standard deviation (square root of the average of the squares of deviations about the mean of a set of data) of these measurements. This sample will be used as In Process Control for the assay. For this purpose the sample will be analyzed in duplicate or triplicate. I want to set a criteria for the standard deviation of this duplicate or triplicate analysis. These criteria should be based on the standarddeviation of the x (for e.g., 15) measurements. How can I estimate the standard deviation for tese duplicate and triplicate measurements. With regards, John |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |