Dear all,
This is my first time posting. I have used the Propensity Score Matching syntax & macro (by R.Levesque adapted by J.Painter). The macro seems to works out pretty well, but I had one question: Does anyone know how to modify the syntax in order to force a match on a specific level of a variable (for example, force gender to be exact)? Thanks so much. Kind regards, Aaron |
Administrator
|
So we are supposed to know which specific syntax you are referring to?
Link please!!! ---
Please reply to the list and not to my personal email.
Those desiring my consulting or training services please feel free to email me. --- "Nolite dare sanctum canibus neque mittatis margaritas vestras ante porcos ne forte conculcent eas pedibus suis." Cum es damnatorum possederunt porcos iens ut salire off sanguinum cliff in abyssum?" |
Yes, sorry, the syntax is here: http://www.unc.edu/~painter/SPSSsyntax/propen.txt
|
Administrator
|
Well, taking a quick peek I would suggest that that is really not the way to write a macro.
Hard coded variable names? Requiring manual input for n of cases? I suspect one way to go would be to segregate the sex variable into 2 files and run separately. Of course remove it from the LOG REG.
Please reply to the list and not to my personal email.
Those desiring my consulting or training services please feel free to email me. --- "Nolite dare sanctum canibus neque mittatis margaritas vestras ante porcos ne forte conculcent eas pedibus suis." Cum es damnatorum possederunt porcos iens ut salire off sanguinum cliff in abyssum?" |
In reply to this post by ach7210
To improve my understanding of your question, should I assume that the logistic regression for participation prediction includes gender?
I have never used the Levesque/Painter syntax but ... If you say that gender is not included, doesn't that reduce to two separate propensity match operations, one for males, one for females? If you say that gender is included, doesn't that cause less than optimal matches? Gene Maguin -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of ach7210 Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 9:57 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: Propensity Score Matching Macro - Forced Matches Yes, sorry, the syntax is here: http://www.unc.edu/~painter/SPSSsyntax/propen.txt -- View this message in context: http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/Propensity-Score-Matching-Macro-Forced-Matches-tp5714641p5714643.html Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
In reply to this post by ach7210
Another approach would be to use the FUZZY
extension command. It is set up for a different structure, but it
includes the ability to specify a match tolerance for each variable or
to construct a custom difference measure. This requires the Python
Essentials available from the SPSS Community website (www.ibm.com/developerworks/spssdevcentral).
Jon Peck (no "h") aka Kim Senior Software Engineer, IBM [hidden email] new phone: 720-342-5621 From: ach7210 <[hidden email]> To: [hidden email] Date: 08/09/2012 07:49 AM Subject: [SPSSX-L] Propensity Score Matching Macro - Forced Matches Sent by: "SPSSX(r) Discussion" <[hidden email]> Dear all, This is my first time posting. I have used the Propensity Score Matching syntax & macro (by R.Levesque adapted by J.Painter). The macro seems to works out pretty well, but I had one question: Does anyone know how to modify the syntax in order to force a match on a specific level of a variable (for example, force gender to be exact)? Thanks so much. Kind regards, Aaron -- View this message in context: http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/Propensity-Score-Matching-Macro-Forced-Matches-tp5714641.html Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |