Hi Team:
This is spss cum stat query. I was wondering if you experts help me solve the following query: Background: I have collected the conjoint data. The design was CVA design i.e. single concept at a time/per screen. Respondents had to allocate the chips among 5 drugs summing to 10 chips. We randomly had shown 7 cards out of 18 cards. Sample size is 196 respondents. We had four attributes with three levels each. Query: Drugs will dependent variables and levels of attributes in conjoint card will be independent variables. Therefore, we have multiple dependent variables and multiple independent variables. I want to find out the impact of independent variable on dependent variable and how IV affects DV. I cannot take on one DV at a time and regress with IVs as DV will be having correlations with other DV - increase in prescription for one drug will obviously reduce the prescription for other drugs which means pure negative correlation. Is there any way I can use SPSS to solve the above query? Due to crunch timeline I will greatly appreciate if you could reply at your earliest. Using manova will simply tell me any difference exists in groups on DV. However, I need to get beta coefficients so that I could translate the impact of each IV on DV. Some suggest that I do regression with one DV at a time with IV? Any thought on this? Please advice. Manmit |
Manmit,
This is tough (only because I have not done this in spss). In manova (between groups), you can generate beta-weights or parameters by ticking parameter estimates before running the manova. Running separate regressions? Why not the conjoint model in spss since this is how you have generated your design. I am thinking this is a probit or logit type of analysis rather than a traditional regression (linear regression) because the dependent variable is not technically a continuous variable. There are other people on the list that could share further light on this. Anthony Babinec (sorry to dob you in Anthony) has a way of adjusting the cox regression analysis to potentially maybe deal with your problem. There are some internet links out there on using spss for conjoing analysis. Best of luck Paul > Manmit Shrimali <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Hi Team: > > > > This is spss cum stat query. I was wondering if you experts help me > solve the following query: > > > > Background: > > I have collected the conjoint data. The design was CVA design i.e. > single concept at a time/per screen. Respondents had to allocate the > chips among 5 drugs summing to 10 chips. We randomly had shown 7 cards > out of 18 cards. Sample size is 196 respondents. We had four attributes > with three levels each. > > > > Query: > > Drugs will dependent variables and levels of attributes in conjoint card > will be independent variables. Therefore, we have multiple dependent > variables and multiple independent variables. I want to find out the > impact of independent variable on dependent variable and how IV affects > DV. I cannot take on one DV at a time and regress with IVs as DV will be > having correlations with other DV - increase in prescription for one > drug will obviously reduce the prescription for other drugs which means > pure negative correlation. > > > > Is there any way I can use SPSS to solve the above query? Due to crunch > timeline I will greatly appreciate if you could reply at your earliest. > Using manova will simply tell me any difference exists in groups on DV. > However, I need to get beta coefficients so that I could translate the > impact of each IV on DV. Some suggest that I do regression with one DV > at a time with IV? Any thought on this? > > > > Please advice. > > > > Manmit |
In reply to this post by Manmit Shrimali-2
Paul:
Thanks for your input. I did not generate the design from SPSS as spss cannot design the CVA allocation based design. Spss will not be able to analyze the multiple DV. I am also open to using other software but I need a base platform to begin with :-). Cheers, M -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 8:00 AM To: Manmit Shrimali Cc: [hidden email] Subject: Re: Regression: Multiple DV Manmit, This is tough (only because I have not done this in spss). In manova (between groups), you can generate beta-weights or parameters by ticking parameter estimates before running the manova. Running separate regressions? Why not the conjoint model in spss since this is how you have generated your design. I am thinking this is a probit or logit type of analysis rather than a traditional regression (linear regression) because the dependent variable is not technically a continuous variable. There are other people on the list that could share further light on this. Anthony Babinec (sorry to dob you in Anthony) has a way of adjusting the cox regression analysis to potentially maybe deal with your problem. There are some internet links out there on using spss for conjoing analysis. Best of luck Paul > Manmit Shrimali <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Hi Team: > > > > This is spss cum stat query. I was wondering if you experts help me > solve the following query: > > > > Background: > > I have collected the conjoint data. The design was CVA design i.e. > single concept at a time/per screen. Respondents had to allocate the > chips among 5 drugs summing to 10 chips. We randomly had shown 7 cards > out of 18 cards. Sample size is 196 respondents. We had four > with three levels each. > > > > Query: > > Drugs will dependent variables and levels of attributes in conjoint card > will be independent variables. Therefore, we have multiple dependent > variables and multiple independent variables. I want to find out the > impact of independent variable on dependent variable and how IV affects > DV. I cannot take on one DV at a time and regress with IVs as DV will be > having correlations with other DV - increase in prescription for one > drug will obviously reduce the prescription for other drugs which means > pure negative correlation. > > > > Is there any way I can use SPSS to solve the above query? Due to crunch > timeline I will greatly appreciate if you could reply at your earliest. > Using manova will simply tell me any difference exists in groups on DV. > However, I need to get beta coefficients so that I could translate the > impact of each IV on DV. Some suggest that I do regression with one DV > at a time with IV? Any thought on this? > > > > Please advice. > > > > Manmit |
Manmit:
You can run the allocation design using Hierarchical Bayes in Sawtooth software. If you have used it before, you know that you will need to generate a chs file which includes the design and allocations. Sawtooth will output respondent-level utilities which you can use to calculate the expected share of each drug. Unlike single-choice conjoint, you cannot directly get the beta coefficients, but you will be able to generate an Excel-like template to calculate expected shares for each drug. Do you have access to Sawtooth software? Dan >From: Manmit Shrimali <[hidden email]> >Reply-To: Manmit Shrimali <[hidden email]> >To: [hidden email] >Subject: Re: Regression: Multiple DV >Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 08:07:08 +0530 > >Paul: > >Thanks for your input. I did not generate the design from SPSS as spss >cannot design the CVA allocation based design. Spss will not be able to >analyze the multiple DV. I am also open to using other software but I >need a base platform to begin with :-). > >Cheers, >M > >-----Original Message----- >From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] >Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 8:00 AM >To: Manmit Shrimali >Cc: [hidden email] >Subject: Re: Regression: Multiple DV > >Manmit, > >This is tough (only because I have not done this in spss). In manova >(between groups), you can generate beta-weights or parameters by ticking >parameter estimates before running the manova. Running separate >regressions? Why not the conjoint model in spss since this is how you >have generated your design. I am thinking this is a probit or logit >type of analysis rather than a traditional regression (linear >regression) because the dependent variable is not technically a >continuous variable. > >There are other people on the list that could share further light on >this. Anthony Babinec (sorry to dob you in Anthony) has a way of >adjusting the cox regression analysis to potentially maybe deal with >your problem. There are some internet links out there on using spss for >conjoing analysis. > >Best of luck > >Paul > > > > Manmit Shrimali <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > Hi Team: > > > > > > > > This is spss cum stat query. I was wondering if you experts help me > > solve the following query: > > > > > > > > Background: > > > > I have collected the conjoint data. The design was CVA design i.e. > > single concept at a time/per screen. Respondents had to allocate the > > chips among 5 drugs summing to 10 chips. We randomly had shown 7 cards > > out of 18 cards. Sample size is 196 respondents. We had four >attributes > > with three levels each. > > > > > > > > Query: > > > > Drugs will dependent variables and levels of attributes in conjoint >card > > will be independent variables. Therefore, we have multiple dependent > > variables and multiple independent variables. I want to find out the > > impact of independent variable on dependent variable and how IV >affects > > DV. I cannot take on one DV at a time and regress with IVs as DV will >be > > having correlations with other DV - increase in prescription for one > > drug will obviously reduce the prescription for other drugs which >means > > pure negative correlation. > > > > > > > > Is there any way I can use SPSS to solve the above query? Due to >crunch > > timeline I will greatly appreciate if you could reply at your >earliest. > > Using manova will simply tell me any difference exists in groups on >DV. > > However, I need to get beta coefficients so that I could translate the > > impact of each IV on DV. Some suggest that I do regression with one DV > > at a time with IV? Any thought on this? > > > > > > > > Please advice. > > > > > > > > Manmit _________________________________________________________________ Exercise your brain! Try Flexicon. http://games.msn.com/en/flexicon/default.htm?icid=flexicon_hmemailtaglinemarch07 |
In reply to this post by Manmit Shrimali-2
Dan:
Thanks for your input. The problem is that currently sawtooth does not offer CVA/HB for allocation type data. It takes only rating for one dependent variable. I designed the survey in sawtooth and I already tried that. If this would have been cbc then there r multiple options. However, options are limited when we are talking about cva constant sum chip allocation type data. -----Original Message----- From: Dan Zetu [mailto:[hidden email]] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 8:53 AM To: Manmit Shrimali; [hidden email] Subject: Re: Regression: Multiple DV Manmit: You can run the allocation design using Hierarchical Bayes in Sawtooth software. If you have used it before, you know that you will need to generate a chs file which includes the design and allocations. Sawtooth will output respondent-level utilities which you can use to calculate the expected share of each drug. Unlike single-choice conjoint, you cannot directly get the beta coefficients, but you will be able to generate an Excel-like template to calculate expected shares for each drug. Do you have access to Sawtooth software? Dan >From: Manmit Shrimali <[hidden email]> >Reply-To: Manmit Shrimali <[hidden email]> >To: [hidden email] >Subject: Re: Regression: Multiple DV >Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 08:07:08 +0530 > >Paul: > >Thanks for your input. I did not generate the design from SPSS as spss >cannot design the CVA allocation based design. Spss will not be able to >analyze the multiple DV. I am also open to using other software but I >need a base platform to begin with :-). > >Cheers, >M > >-----Original Message----- >From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] >Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 8:00 AM >To: Manmit Shrimali >Cc: [hidden email] >Subject: Re: Regression: Multiple DV > >Manmit, > >This is tough (only because I have not done this in spss). In manova >(between groups), you can generate beta-weights or parameters by >parameter estimates before running the manova. Running separate >regressions? Why not the conjoint model in spss since this is how you >have generated your design. I am thinking this is a probit or logit >type of analysis rather than a traditional regression (linear >regression) because the dependent variable is not technically a >continuous variable. > >There are other people on the list that could share further light on >this. Anthony Babinec (sorry to dob you in Anthony) has a way of >adjusting the cox regression analysis to potentially maybe deal with >your problem. There are some internet links out there on using spss >conjoing analysis. > >Best of luck > >Paul > > > > Manmit Shrimali <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > Hi Team: > > > > > > > > This is spss cum stat query. I was wondering if you experts help me > > solve the following query: > > > > > > > > Background: > > > > I have collected the conjoint data. The design was CVA design i.e. > > single concept at a time/per screen. Respondents had to allocate the > > chips among 5 drugs summing to 10 chips. We randomly had shown 7 > > out of 18 cards. Sample size is 196 respondents. We had four >attributes > > with three levels each. > > > > > > > > Query: > > > > Drugs will dependent variables and levels of attributes in conjoint >card > > will be independent variables. Therefore, we have multiple dependent > > variables and multiple independent variables. I want to find out the > > impact of independent variable on dependent variable and how IV >affects > > DV. I cannot take on one DV at a time and regress with IVs as DV >be > > having correlations with other DV - increase in prescription for one > > drug will obviously reduce the prescription for other drugs which >means > > pure negative correlation. > > > > > > > > Is there any way I can use SPSS to solve the above query? Due to >crunch > > timeline I will greatly appreciate if you could reply at your >earliest. > > Using manova will simply tell me any difference exists in groups on >DV. > > However, I need to get beta coefficients so that I could translate > > impact of each IV on DV. Some suggest that I do regression with one DV > > at a time with IV? Any thought on this? > > > > > > > > Please advice. > > > > > > > > Manmit _________________________________________________________________ Exercise your brain! Try Flexicon. http://games.msn.com/en/flexicon/default.htm?icid=flexicon_hmemailtaglin emarch07 |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |