Hi,
I am using SPSS 27 and running an Exact Fisher on data. I am receiving this message: Cannot be computed because unable to open temporary file. The file is working for other calculations (descriptives, chi square, etc.) Any suggestions on how to fix? Thanks ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
Administrator
|
Googling <spss temporary file> took me to this tech support page:
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/cannot-be-computed-because-unable-open-temporary-file-when-attempting-run-ibm-spss-statistics-procedure FWIW, when I open a DOS window and issue the command shown on that page, I get a message saying "The system cannot find the path specified". Either I did something wrong, or the instructions given on that page need to be updated. (I am currently running SPSS 25 [64-bit] under Windows 10 Education, by the way.) In any case, the info on that page suggests to me a couple of possibilities about your problem: 1. You did not run as an Administrator when you installed SPSS; or 2. Your account on the computer where you are using SPSS is not an Administrator account. If you are using Windows, you could try this advice from the tech support website: "Uninstall the product and reinstall the product by right-clicking on the program installer executable file and selecting the 'Run as administrator' option." Maybe Jon or Rick have some other ideas? Good luck. HTH. Heather Gilmartin wrote > Hi, > > I am using SPSS 27 and running an Exact Fisher on data. I am receiving > this message: Cannot be computed because unable to open temporary file. > > The file is working for other calculations (descriptives, chi square, > etc.) Any suggestions on how to fix? > > Thanks > > ===================== > To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to > LISTSERV@.UGA > (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the > command. To leave the list, send the command > SIGNOFF SPSSX-L > For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command > INFO REFCARD ----- -- Bruce Weaver [hidden email] http://sites.google.com/a/lakeheadu.ca/bweaver/ "When all else fails, RTFM." NOTE: My Hotmail account is not monitored regularly. To send me an e-mail, please use the address shown above. -- Sent from: http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/ ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD
--
Bruce Weaver bweaver@lakeheadu.ca http://sites.google.com/a/lakeheadu.ca/bweaver/ "When all else fails, RTFM." PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING: 1. My Hotmail account is not monitored regularly. To send me an e-mail, please use the address shown above. 2. The SPSSX Discussion forum on Nabble is no longer linked to the SPSSX-L listserv administered by UGA (https://listserv.uga.edu/). |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Heather Gilmartin
Hello Heather. In my first response (just a few minutes ago), I suggested
lack of Admin rights as a possible reason for the problem you're having. In this post, I'm asking for more detail about your data. If you have a 2x2 table and are using Fisher's exact test because one or more of the expected frequencies are low, it may be that you'd be better off using the N-1 Chi-square test. See Ian Campbell's website (and Statistics in Medicine article) for more details. https://www.iancampbell.co.uk/twobytwo/twobytwo.htm Here is Campbell's advice from the top of that page: --- start of excerpt --- The best policy in the analysis of two-by-two tables is: (1) Where all expected numbers are at least 1, analyse by the 'N - 1' chi-squared test (the K. Pearson chi-squared test but with N replaced by N - 1). (2) Otherwise, analyse by the Fisher-Irwin test, with two-sided tests carried out by Irwin's rule (taking tables from either tail as likely, or less, as that observed). These recommendations apply to data from either comparative trials or cross-sectional studies, and update those of Cochran (1952, 1954). --- end of excerpt --- Regarding that last sentence, it is saying that the advice applies to study designs where the marginal totals are not fixed in advance. When the marginal totals are fixed in advance, Campbell advises using Fisher's exact test, or the Fisher-Irwin test as he calls it. (He calls it that, because J.O. Irwin also worked out the same test independently of Fisher, but rarely gets remembered nowadays.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Oscar_Irwin Finally, if you do want to use the N-1 Chi-square test, notice that for 2x2 tables, the test of "linear-by-linear association" in the CROSSTABS output is equivalent to the N-1 Chi-square. Busing FM, Weaver B, Dubois S. 2 × 2 Tables: a note on Campbell's recommendation. Stat Med. 2016;35(8):1354-1358. doi:10.1002/sim.6808 HTH. ----- -- Bruce Weaver [hidden email] http://sites.google.com/a/lakeheadu.ca/bweaver/ "When all else fails, RTFM." NOTE: My Hotmail account is not monitored regularly. To send me an e-mail, please use the address shown above. -- Sent from: http://spssx-discussion.1045642.n5.nabble.com/ ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD
--
Bruce Weaver bweaver@lakeheadu.ca http://sites.google.com/a/lakeheadu.ca/bweaver/ "When all else fails, RTFM." PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING: 1. My Hotmail account is not monitored regularly. To send me an e-mail, please use the address shown above. 2. The SPSSX Discussion forum on Nabble is no longer linked to the SPSSX-L listserv administered by UGA (https://listserv.uga.edu/). |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |