|
Dear
Statalist,
I noticed that since
version 17 (maybe since version 16, but I don't know since I skipped that
version) syntax files appear different in Windows Notepad than before.
I occasionally open
a syntax file in Notepad to prevent myself from mixing up two almost identical
versions of a syntax file.
But since version 17
all syntax is displayed in Notepad in one (very long) syntax lines. It seems as
if the end-of-line symbols (CR-LF) are handled differently?
Do you know a
solution for my problem?
Kind regards,
Adriaan
Hoogendoorn
GGZ
inGeest
|
|
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:34:35 +0200, Hoogendoorn, Adriaan
<[hidden email]> wrote: >Dear Statalist, > >I noticed that since version 17 (maybe since version 16, but I don't know since I skipped that version) syntax files appear different in Windows Notepad than before. >I occasionally open a syntax file in Notepad to prevent myself from mixing up two almost identical versions of a syntax file. >But since version 17 all syntax is displayed in Notepad in one (very long) syntax lines. It seems as if the end-of-line symbols (CR-LF) are handled differently? >Do you know a solution for my problem? > >Kind regards, >Adriaan Hoogendoorn >GGZ inGeest > Apologies for addressing you as Statalist, My multi-linguistical confusion seems to go further than mixing DESCRIPTIVES with summarize and FREQUENCIES with tab Kind regards, Adriaan Hoogendoorn ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
In reply to this post by Hoogendoorn, Adriaan
<file><new><syntax> Art Kendall Social Research Consultants Hoogendoorn, Adriaan wrote: ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD
Art Kendall
Social Research Consultants |
|
In reply to this post by Hoogendoorn, Adriaan
Hi again
Adriaan,
This is due
to a Java default of using a single line-feed character to mark the end of a
line, while Windows uses a line-feed and carriage-return. This affects both
syntax and journal files beginning with Release 16. In Release 18.0, journal
files are saved with LF/CR. Beginning with Release 18.0.1, syntax files should
also be saved with both. Opening syntax files created with Releases 16-18.0.0 in
18.0.1 and saving them should resolve things for existing
files.
Best,
Dave
David Nichols, Ph.D. From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Hoogendoorn, Adriaan Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 6:35 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: [SPSSX-L] Syntax Files in PASW version 17 Dear
Statalist,
I noticed that since
version 17 (maybe since version 16, but I don't know since I skipped that
version) syntax files appear different in Windows Notepad than before.
I occasionally open
a syntax file in Notepad to prevent myself from mixing up two almost identical
versions of a syntax file.
But since version 17
all syntax is displayed in Notepad in one (very long) syntax lines. It seems as
if the end-of-line symbols (CR-LF) are handled differently?
Do you know a
solution for my problem?
Kind regards,
Adriaan
Hoogendoorn
GGZ
inGeest
|
|
In reply to this post by Art Kendall
Hi Adriaan
> Hoogendoorn, Adriaan wrote: > Dear Statalist, > > I noticed that since version 17 (maybe since version 16, but I don't > know since I skipped that version) syntax files appear different in > Windows Notepad than before. > I occasionally open a syntax file in Notepad to prevent myself from > mixing up two almost identical versions of a syntax file. > But since version 17 all syntax is displayed in Notepad in one (very > long) syntax lines. It seems as if the end-of-line symbols (CR-LF) are > handled differently? > Do you know a solution for my problem? > not noticed before because I never use Notepad to open syntax files, but Metapad (a Notepad-like freeware program with better functionality than Notepad, like sending the syntax file to SPSS/PASW to run it from Metapad, better find/replace functions, several language packs...), and Metapad handles the syntax files correctly. I recommend you to stop using Notepad and switch to Metapad. This is the link: http://liquidninja.com/metapad/download.html HTH, Marta GG -- For miscellaneous SPSS related statistical stuff, visit: http://gjyp.nl/marta/ ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
In reply to this post by Hoogendoorn, Adriaan
Try WordPad (component of Windows). Works fine for me.
|
|
In reply to this post by SPSS Technical Support Notification
This feels like partly an SPSS question
and partly general statistics techniques, so I hope I’m not out of line
asking here. I ran a concept test that tested two
flavors of a product. There were a few other questions in between, but
the second question was the same as the first other than different introduction
text. The results show some variation that is attributable to the
preference for the flavor, but mostly a general shift down for the second
question (mean shift about 0.3 on a 5 point scale). It looks like
there are some effects of general respondent fatigue, or perhaps just “I
answered on the first, I’m less excited about the second”. I’d like to make use of both
questions in some of the analysis, but I’m not sure how best to do this. I
have generated a variable showing whether the flavor was presented 1st
or 2nd, and can use this in regression. But I’d like to do more, and to
present the combined results in some way that is reasonably justifiable. Would
it be legitimate to create recoded variables with either the original value if
the concept was presented first, or an increased number of the concept was
second - say adding 1 to the score randomly every 1 out of 3 responses? Is
there a proper way to handle this phenomenon? Thanks _________________________________________________________________________ |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
