Validation study
Locked
 
|
Hi all,
I am new in this list. My apology if it is not directly related to SPSS. Just assume that the items for each of the 4 domains to assess XXXX are already constructed. Assume further that the items for each domain were constructed based on the theme of the domain. However, the entire assessment instrument has not yet been subjected to any validation study. I dont know if the following procedure of validating the instrument is in accordance with the acceptable procedure: 1. Pilot test the initial instrument 2. Subject the items to exploratory factor analysis analysis. The purpose is to investigate if items are loaded to the right domain. Come-up with an instrucment based on the results of the EFA. I dont know if this step is correct? 3. The resulting instrument in step 2 would be tested to another sample. 4. Subject the instrument to CFA. 5. If the step 4 is "OK", then compute the cronbach's alpha to investegate the reliability of the instrument. I am pleased and thankful if you would correct and suggest me how to validate the instrument. Pdf of relevant references are most welcome Thank you in advance. Jims Find your perfect match today at the new Yahoo!7 Dating. Get Started http://au.dating.yahoo.com/?cid=53151&pid=1012 ====================To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
|
Hi all,
Extend my million thanks to Pushpender Nath [hidden email] for providing me this revelant reference: A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs Gilbert A. Churchill, Jr. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 16, No. 1. (Feb., 1979), pp. 64-73. I would appreciate if you could cite articles in the areas of Phychology and social sciences that adapted such reference in developing their measures. Thank you. Jims --- On Fri, 14/11/08, Pushpender Nath <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Pushpender Nath <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: Validation study To: [hidden email] Received: Friday, 14 November, 2008, 6:38 AM Hi Jims Follow the methodology explained in the attached PDF. This is the most common used and I should say extensively used reference in literature. All d best. On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Jims More <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi all, I am new in this list. My apology if it is not directly related to SPSS. Just assume that the items for each of the 4 domains to assess XXXX are already constructed. Assume further that the items for each domain were constructed based on the theme of the domain. However, the entire assessment instrument has not yet been subjected to any validation study. I dont know if the following procedure of validating the instrument is in accordance with the acceptable procedure: 1. Pilot test the initial instrument 2. Subject the items to exploratory factor analysis analysis. The purpose is to investigate if items are loaded to the right domain. Come-up with an instrucment based on the results of the EFA. I dont know if this step is correct? 3. The resulting instrument in step 2 would be tested to another sample. 4. Subject the instrument to CFA. 5. If the step 4 is "OK", then compute the cronbach's alpha to investegate the reliability of the instrument. I am pleased and thankful if you would correct and suggest me how to validate the instrument. Pdf of relevant references are most welcome Thank you in advance. Jims Find your perfect match today at the new Yahoo!7 Dating.. Get Started http://au.dating.yahoo.com/?cid=53151&pid=1012 To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD -- Regards Pushpender Nath Make the switch to the world's best email. Get Yahoo!7 Mail! http://au.yahoo.com/y7mail ====================To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
|
Hi,
Is there a newer one related to the one cited by Jims? It is already 11 years old! Johnny --- On Fri, 11/14/08, Jims More <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Jims More <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: Validation study To: [hidden email] Date: Friday, 14 November, 2008, 5:56 PM Hi all, Extend my million thanks to Pushpender Nath [hidden email] for providing me this revelant reference: A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs Gilbert A. Churchill, Jr. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 16, No. 1. (Feb., 1979), pp. 64-73. I would appreciate if you could cite articles in the areas of Phychology and social sciences that adapted such reference in developing their measures. Thank you. Jims --- On Fri, 14/11/08, Pushpender Nath <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Pushpender Nath <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: Validation study To: [hidden email] Received: Friday, 14 November, 2008, 6:38 AM Hi Jims Follow the methodology explained in the attached PDF. This is the most common used and I should say extensively used reference in literature. All d best. On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Jims More <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi all, I am new in this list. My apology if it is not directly related to SPSS. Just assume that the items for each of the 4 domains to assess XXXX are already constructed. Assume further that the items for each domain were constructed based on the theme of the domain. However, the entire assessment instrument has not yet been subjected to any validation study. I dont know if the following procedure of validating the instrument is in accordance with the acceptable procedure: 1. Pilot test the initial instrument 2. Subject the items to exploratory factor analysis analysis. The purpose is to investigate if items are loaded to the right domain. Come-up with an instrucment based on the results of the EFA. I dont know if this step is correct? 3. The resulting instrument in step 2 would be tested to another sample. 4. Subject the instrument to CFA. 5. If the step 4 is "OK", then compute the cronbach's alpha to investegate the reliability of the instrument. I am pleased and thankful if you would correct and suggest me how to validate the instrument. Pdf of relevant references are most welcome Thank you in advance. Jims Find your perfect match today at the new Yahoo!7 Dating.. Get Started http://au.dating.yahoo.com/?cid=53151&pid=1012 To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD -- Regards Pushpender Nath Make the switch to the world's best email. Get Yahoo!7 Mail! http://au.yahoo.com/y7mail ====================To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD Try the new Yahoo! Messenger ====================To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
|
In reply to this post by Jims More
hi guys
pls check google scholar or any online library for its usage. you will find hundreds of papers using this ref. good luck On 11/14/08, Jims More <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Extend my million thanks to Pushpender Nath [hidden email] for > providing me this revelant reference: > > A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs > Gilbert A. Churchill, Jr. > Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 16, No. 1. (Feb., 1979), pp. 64-73. > > I would appreciate if you could cite articles in the areas of Phychology and > social sciences that adapted such reference in developing their measures. > > Thank you. > Jims > > --- On Fri, 14/11/08, Pushpender Nath <[hidden email]> wrote: > > From: Pushpender Nath <[hidden email]> > Subject: Re: Validation study > To: [hidden email] > Received: Friday, 14 November, 2008, 6:38 AM > > > > Hi Jims > Follow the methodology explained in the attached PDF. This is the most > common used and I should say extensively used reference in literature. > All d best. > > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Jims More <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Hi all, > I am new in this list. My apology if it is not directly related to SPSS. > > Just assume that the items for each of the 4 domains to assess XXXX are > already constructed. Assume further that the items for each domain were > constructed based on the theme of the domain. However, the entire > assessment instrument has not yet been subjected to any validation study. I > dont know if the following procedure of validating the instrument is in > accordance with the acceptable procedure: > > 1. Pilot test the initial instrument > 2. Subject the items to exploratory factor analysis analysis. The purpose > is to investigate if items are loaded to the right domain. Come-up with an > instrucment based on the results of the EFA. I dont know if this step is > correct? > 3. The resulting instrument in step 2 would be tested to another sample. > 4. Subject the instrument to CFA. > 5. If the step 4 is "OK", then compute the cronbach's alpha to investegate > the reliability of the instrument. > > I am pleased and thankful if you would correct and suggest me how to > validate the instrument. Pdf of relevant references are most welcome > > Thank you in advance. > Jims > > > Find your perfect match today at the new Yahoo!7 Dating.. Get Started > http://au.dating.yahoo.com/?cid=53151&pid=1012 > > To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to > [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the > command. To leave the list, send the command > SIGNOFF SPSSX-L > For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command > INFO REFCARD > > > > -- > Regards > > Pushpender Nath > > > > Make the switch to the world's best email. Get Yahoo!7 Mail! > http://au.yahoo.com/y7mail -- Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com Regards Pushpender Nath ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
In reply to this post by Jims More
Actually a lot of marketing research could also be called applied
psychology. MR is often done by people with psychology backgrounds. Actually the use of EFA _to double check the item keying_ is useful at all phases of instrument development and application. Art Kendall Social Research Consultants Jims More wrote: > Hi all, > > Extend my million thanks to Pushpender Nath [hidden email] for providing me this revelant reference: > > A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs > Gilbert A. Churchill, Jr. > Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 16, No. 1. (Feb., 1979), pp. 64-73. > > I would appreciate if you could cite articles in the areas of Phychology and social sciences that adapted such reference in developing their measures. > > Thank you. > Jims > > --- On Fri, 14/11/08, Pushpender Nath <[hidden email]> wrote: > > From: Pushpender Nath <[hidden email]> > Subject: Re: Validation study > To: [hidden email] > Received: Friday, 14 November, 2008, 6:38 AM > > > > Hi Jims > Follow the methodology explained in the attached PDF. This is the most common used and I should say extensively used reference in literature. > All d best. > > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Jims More <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Hi all, > I am new in this list. My apology if it is not directly related to SPSS. > > Just assume that the items for each of the 4 domains to assess XXXX are already constructed. Assume further that the items for each domain were constructed based on the theme of the domain. However, the entire assessment instrument has not yet been subjected to any validation study. I dont know if the following procedure of validating the instrument is in accordance with the acceptable procedure: > > 1. Pilot test the initial instrument > 2. Subject the items to exploratory factor analysis analysis. The purpose is to investigate if items are loaded to the right domain. Come-up with an instrucment based on the results of the EFA. I dont know if this step is correct? > 3. The resulting instrument in step 2 would be tested to another sample. > 4. Subject the instrument to CFA. > 5. If the step 4 is "OK", then compute the cronbach's alpha to investegate the reliability of the instrument. > > I am pleased and thankful if you would correct and suggest me how to validate the instrument. Pdf of relevant references are most welcome > > Thank you in advance. > Jims > > > Find your perfect match today at the new Yahoo!7 Dating.. Get Started http://au.dating.yahoo.com/?cid=53151&pid=1012 > > To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to > [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the > command. To leave the list, send the command > SIGNOFF SPSSX-L > For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command > INFO REFCARD > > > > ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD
Art Kendall
Social Research Consultants |
«
Return to SPSSX Discussion
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |