awareness
Locked
 
|
You might be interested to help. Please complete the five point scale on awareness:
5 = very aware 4 = aware 3 = ? 2 = unaware 1 = very unaware You are free to suggest a different "verbal interpretaion" if you wish. Thank you. Eins --------------------------------- Importing contacts has never been easier.. Bring your friends over to Yahoo! Mail today! ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
|
Dear Eins
To avoid neutral responses the authors of the below paper used "only to be used if a definite answer is not possible" for the central response. From a cultural perspective this was effective as Chinese students are likely to answer neutral or no comment - which is a common phenomenon experienced by my team and many researchers here. You may need to consider the cultural relevance of your study. Leung, D.Y.P., & Kember, D. (2005). Comparability of data gathered from evaluation questionnaires on paper and through the internet. Research in Higher Education, 46(5), 571-591. Regards Wincy _________________________________ Centre for the Advancement of University Teaching Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention Faculty of Education University of Hong Kong Tel: +852 2859 1113 www.caut.hku.hk http://csrp.hku.hk www.hku.hk/education -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Eins Bernardo Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 7:51 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: awareness You might be interested to help. Please complete the five point scale on awareness: 5 = very aware 4 = aware 3 = ? 2 = unaware 1 = very unaware You are free to suggest a different "verbal interpretaion" if you wish. Thank you. Eins --------------------------------- Importing contacts has never been easier.. Bring your friends over to Yahoo! Mail today! ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
|
In reply to this post by E. Bernardo
There cannot be a middle position, because one cannot be in state of being neither aware nor unaware! I think some would argue that there cannot be degrees of awareness either: one is either aware or not. This last sentiment may seem to be pernickety; but some respondents at least would be thrown by the logical dilemma!
Richard -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Eins Bernardo Sent: 09 January 2009 11:51 To: [hidden email] Subject: awareness You might be interested to help. Please complete the five point scale on awareness: 5 = very aware 4 = aware 3 = ? 2 = unaware 1 = very unaware You are free to suggest a different "verbal interpretaion" if you wish. Thank you. Eins --------------------------------- Importing contacts has never been easier.. Bring your friends over to Yahoo! Mail today! ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
|
I agree that there is no degree of unawareness and there is no state of neither aware nor unaware. However, I do think there can be degrees of awareness. I may be somewhat aware of conditions within a specific neighborhood but if I had a clinic in that neighborhood, I might be very aware.
Paul R. Swank, Ph.D Professor and Director of Research Children's Learning Institute University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, TX 77038 -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of rhw Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 8:50 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: awareness There cannot be a middle position, because one cannot be in state of being neither aware nor unaware! I think some would argue that there cannot be degrees of awareness either: one is either aware or not. This last sentiment may seem to be pernickety; but some respondents at least would be thrown by the logical dilemma! Richard -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Eins Bernardo Sent: 09 January 2009 11:51 To: [hidden email] Subject: awareness You might be interested to help. Please complete the five point scale on awareness: 5 = very aware 4 = aware 3 = ? 2 = unaware 1 = very unaware You are free to suggest a different "verbal interpretaion" if you wish. Thank you. Eins --------------------------------- Importing contacts has never been easier.. Bring your friends over to Yahoo! Mail today! ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
|
I also agree that you either aware or not aware, but I think what you are talking about is degrees of knowledge, not awareness. I think awareness in this context says more about how much your care or how important the subject is rather than how "aware" you are. Being "very aware" about a subject to me indicates that it has an impact on my life, not how much I know about the subject.
RG Rodrigo A. Guerrero | Director Of Marketing Research and Analysis | The Scooter Store | 830.627.4317 -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Swank, Paul R Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 9:09 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: awareness I agree that there is no degree of unawareness and there is no state of neither aware nor unaware. However, I do think there can be degrees of awareness. I may be somewhat aware of conditions within a specific neighborhood but if I had a clinic in that neighborhood, I might be very aware. Paul R. Swank, Ph.D Professor and Director of Research Children's Learning Institute University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, TX 77038 -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of rhw Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 8:50 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: awareness There cannot be a middle position, because one cannot be in state of being neither aware nor unaware! I think some would argue that there cannot be degrees of awareness either: one is either aware or not. This last sentiment may seem to be pernickety; but some respondents at least would be thrown by the logical dilemma! Richard -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Eins Bernardo Sent: 09 January 2009 11:51 To: [hidden email] Subject: awareness You might be interested to help. Please complete the five point scale on awareness: 5 = very aware 4 = aware 3 = ? 2 = unaware 1 = very unaware You are free to suggest a different "verbal interpretaion" if you wish. Thank you. Eins --------------------------------- Importing contacts has never been easier.. Bring your friends over to Yahoo! Mail today! ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD The information transmitted is intended only for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or privileged material, or both. Any review, receipt, dissemination or other use of this information by non-addressees is prohibited. If you received this in error or are a non-addressee, please contact the sender and delete the transmitted information. ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
|
I agree. Being in the middle of something has a much bigger impact on my life than being at the periphery. I am aware of a lot of things that go on in the world, to a greater or lesser degree depending on how much it impacts me. And certain things will impact me more than others and so I will be more aware of them.
Paul R. Swank, Ph.D Professor and Director of Research Children's Learning Institute University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, TX 77038 -----Original Message----- From: Guerrero, Rodrigo [mailto:[hidden email]] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 9:22 AM To: Swank, Paul R; [hidden email] Subject: RE: Re: awareness I also agree that you either aware or not aware, but I think what you are talking about is degrees of knowledge, not awareness. I think awareness in this context says more about how much your care or how important the subject is rather than how "aware" you are. Being "very aware" about a subject to me indicates that it has an impact on my life, not how much I know about the subject. RG Rodrigo A. Guerrero | Director Of Marketing Research and Analysis | The Scooter Store | 830.627.4317 -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Swank, Paul R Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 9:09 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: awareness I agree that there is no degree of unawareness and there is no state of neither aware nor unaware. However, I do think there can be degrees of awareness. I may be somewhat aware of conditions within a specific neighborhood but if I had a clinic in that neighborhood, I might be very aware. Paul R. Swank, Ph.D Professor and Director of Research Children's Learning Institute University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, TX 77038 -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of rhw Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 8:50 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: awareness There cannot be a middle position, because one cannot be in state of being neither aware nor unaware! I think some would argue that there cannot be degrees of awareness either: one is either aware or not. This last sentiment may seem to be pernickety; but some respondents at least would be thrown by the logical dilemma! Richard -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Eins Bernardo Sent: 09 January 2009 11:51 To: [hidden email] Subject: awareness You might be interested to help. Please complete the five point scale on awareness: 5 = very aware 4 = aware 3 = ? 2 = unaware 1 = very unaware You are free to suggest a different "verbal interpretaion" if you wish. Thank you. Eins --------------------------------- Importing contacts has never been easier.. Bring your friends over to Yahoo! Mail today! ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD The information transmitted is intended only for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or privileged material, or both. Any review, receipt, dissemination or other use of this information by non-addressees is prohibited. If you received this in error or are a non-addressee, please contact the sender and delete the transmitted information. ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
|
In reply to this post by Guerrero, Rodrigo
However illogical it might seem to those who respond to language with analytic precision, it's clear that everyday usage implicitly recognises degrees of awareness - that's why I used the word "pernickety" to refer to those who might deny such degrees! In the UK at least there is not only the phrase "dimly aware of", but the phrase "completely unaware of" - which certainly sounds like a degree of UNawareness of which there might be lesser forms! The challenge is to find question and scale wordings which communicate unambiguously while not being so far from everyday language as to alienate or intimidate the respondent.
In Eins' case I suspect that Rodrigo is right in suggesting that degree of knowledge (or concern or "inform-edness"(?!)) is being sought. With these "scales" too there can be no degrees below "none" or "absence". On the other hand, Eins, you may want to capture the distinction between those who have (say) "no concern" and those for whom whatever may give rise to concern in some is not even "on their radar" - those who hadn't even thought (or felt?) about the matter until you posed your question! For such people you would need an item which does not come from the scale, but allows the respondent to signify that the scale is just "not applicable" to them. In some contexts, "disinterested" might capture that special case - were it not that "disinterested" is widely equated with "uninterested"! Perhaps you would like to give the context of your post, Eins? Richard -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Guerrero, Rodrigo Sent: 09 January 2009 15:22 To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: awareness I also agree that you either aware or not aware, but I think what you are talking about is degrees of knowledge, not awareness. I think awareness in this context says more about how much your care or how important the subject is rather than how "aware" you are. Being "very aware" about a subject to me indicates that it has an impact on my life, not how much I know about the subject. RG Rodrigo A. Guerrero | Director Of Marketing Research and Analysis | The Scooter Store | 830.627.4317 -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Swank, Paul R Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 9:09 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: awareness I agree that there is no degree of unawareness and there is no state of neither aware nor unaware. However, I do think there can be degrees of awareness. I may be somewhat aware of conditions within a specific neighborhood but if I had a clinic in that neighborhood, I might be very aware. Paul R. Swank, Ph.D Professor and Director of Research Children's Learning Institute University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, TX 77038 -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of rhw Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 8:50 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: awareness There cannot be a middle position, because one cannot be in state of being neither aware nor unaware! I think some would argue that there cannot be degrees of awareness either: one is either aware or not. This last sentiment may seem to be pernickety; but some respondents at least would be thrown by the logical dilemma! Richard -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Eins Bernardo Sent: 09 January 2009 11:51 To: [hidden email] Subject: awareness You might be interested to help. Please complete the five point scale on awareness: 5 = very aware 4 = aware 3 = ? 2 = unaware 1 = very unaware You are free to suggest a different "verbal interpretaion" if you wish. Thank you. Eins --------------------------------- Importing contacts has never been easier.. Bring your friends over to Yahoo! Mail today! ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD The information transmitted is intended only for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential or privileged material, or both. Any review, receipt, dissemination or other use of this information by non-addressees is prohibited. If you received this in error or are a non-addressee, please contact the sender and delete the transmitted information. ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
|
At 07:04 AM 1/9/2009, rhw wrote:
>However illogical it might seem to those who respond to language with >analytic precision, it's clear that everyday usage implicitly recognises >degrees of awareness - that's why I used the word "pernickety" to refer to >those who might deny such degrees! In the UK at least there is not only >the phrase "dimly aware of", but the phrase "completely unaware of" - >which certainly sounds like a degree of UNawareness of which there might >be lesser forms! The challenge is to find question and scale wordings >which communicate unambiguously while not being so far from everyday >language as to alienate or intimidate the respondent. . . . I appreciate the discussion on this subject. For one thing, it illustrates the perils of assuming that, for any X, one can construct a meaningful Likert scale using the paradigm, 5-Very X 4- X 3- ? 2- dis-X (or un-X) 1- Very dis-X (or un-X) In the case of X = aware, however, I would like to suggest yet another aspect: One's "awareness" can be misguided. For example, in the case of the run-up to the invasion of Iraq, the entire nation was hyper-"aware" of Iraq's alleged nuclear threat -- but it was all a hoax. Of course we cannot expect respondents to know when they are misinformed, but we can be cautious about jumping to conclusions about what a certain level of "awareness" means. "Awareness" is not always factually based, and may actually be based on myths or propaganda that have been accepted as truthful. For this reason, when reporting results, I think it is important to stick as closely as possible to the language of the question itself, to the point of pedantry, rather than reporting the results in an interpretive way that jumps to conclusions about the respondents' understanding of the question. Bob Schacht Robert M. Schacht, Ph.D. <[hidden email]> Pacific Basin Rehabilitation Research & Training Center 1268 Young Street, Suite #204 Research Center, University of Hawaii Honolulu, HI 96814 ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
|
I believe this has been taken care of already.
"There are known knowns. These are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know. " Let's?assume that the Likert scale could capture this brilliant discrimination of knowledge: 5-Very much a known known 4- known known 3- known unknown 2-?unknown?unknown 1-?things we really don't know we don't?know? ? -----Original Message----- From: Bob Schacht <[hidden email]> To: [hidden email] Sent: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 2:00 pm Subject: Re: awareness At 07:04 AM 1/9/2009, rhw wrote:? >However illogical it might seem to those who respond to language with? >analytic precision, it's clear that everyday usage implicitly recognises? >degrees of awareness - that's why I used the word "pernickety" to refer to? >those who might deny such degrees! In the UK at least there is not only? >the phrase "dimly aware of", but the phrase "completely unaware of" -? >which certainly sounds like a degree of UNawareness of which there might? >be lesser forms! The challenge is to find question and scale wordings? >which communicate unambiguously while not being so far from everyday? >language as to alienate or intimidate the respondent. . . .? ? I appreciate the discussion on this subject. For one thing, it illustrates? the perils of assuming that, for any X, one can construct a meaningful? Likert scale using the paradigm,? 5-Very X? 4- X? 3- ?? 2- dis-X (or un-X)? 1- Very dis-X (or un-X)? ? In the case of X = aware, however, I would like to suggest yet another? aspect: One's "awareness" can be misguided.? For example, in the case of the run-up to the invasion of Iraq, the entire? nation was hyper-"aware" of Iraq's alleged nuclear threat -- but it was all? a hoax. Of course we cannot expect respondents to know when they are? misinformed, but we can be cautious about jumping to conclusions about what? a certain level of "awareness" means. "Awareness" is not always factually? based, and may actually be based on myths or propaganda that have been? accepted as truthful.? ? For this reason, when reporting results, I think it is important to stick? as closely as possible to the language of the question itself, to the point? of pedantry, rather than reporting the results in an interpretive way that? jumps to conclusions about the respondents' understanding of the question.? ? Bob Schacht? ? Robert M. Schacht, Ph.D. <[hidden email]>? Pacific Basin Rehabilitation Research & Training Center? 1268 Young Street, Suite #204? Research Center, University of Hawaii? Honolulu, HI 96814? ? =====================? To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to? [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the? command. To leave the list, send the command? SIGNOFF SPSSX-L? For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command? INFO REFCARD? ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
|
In reply to this post by rhw
I think Enis is looking for something that combines awareness with knowledge
of the brand/product/service. The scale below might at least be ordinal. 1 - Never heard of 2 - Know the name, but that's about all 3 - Know something about it, but never tried/used/ate/purchased it. 4 - Tried/used/ate/purchased it. ----- Original Message ----- From: "rhw" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 10:04 AM Subject: Re: awareness > However illogical it might seem to those who respond to language with > analytic precision, it's clear that everyday usage implicitly recognises > degrees of awareness - that's why I used the word "pernickety" to refer to > those who might deny such degrees! In the UK at least there is not only > the phrase "dimly aware of", but the phrase "completely unaware of" - > which certainly sounds like a degree of UNawareness of which there might > be lesser forms! The challenge is to find question and scale wordings > which communicate unambiguously while not being so far from everyday > language as to alienate or intimidate the respondent. > > In Eins' case I suspect that Rodrigo is right in suggesting that degree of > knowledge (or concern or "inform-edness"(?!)) is being sought. With these > "scales" too there can be no degrees below "none" or "absence". On the > other hand, Eins, you may want to capture the distinction between those > who have (say) "no concern" and those for whom whatever may give rise to > concern in some is not even "on their radar" - those who hadn't even > thought (or felt?) about the matter until you posed your question! For > such people you would need an item which does not come from the scale, but > allows the respondent to signify that the scale is just "not applicable" > to them. In some contexts, "disinterested" might capture that special > case - were it not that "disinterested" is widely equated with > "uninterested"! Perhaps you would like to give the context of your post, > Eins? > > Richard > > -----Original Message----- > From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of > Guerrero, Rodrigo > Sent: 09 January 2009 15:22 > To: [hidden email] > Subject: Re: awareness > > I also agree that you either aware or not aware, but I think what you are > talking about is degrees of knowledge, not awareness. I think awareness > in this context says more about how much your care or how important the > subject is rather than how "aware" you are. Being "very aware" about a > subject to me indicates that it has an impact on my life, not how much I > know about the subject. > > RG > > Rodrigo A. Guerrero | Director Of Marketing Research and Analysis | The > Scooter Store | 830.627.4317 > > -----Original Message----- > From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of > Swank, Paul R > Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 9:09 AM > To: [hidden email] > Subject: Re: awareness > > I agree that there is no degree of unawareness and there is no state of > neither aware nor unaware. However, I do think there can be degrees of > awareness. I may be somewhat aware of conditions within a specific > neighborhood but if I had a clinic in that neighborhood, I might be very > aware. > > Paul R. Swank, Ph.D > Professor and Director of Research > Children's Learning Institute > University of Texas Health Science Center > Houston, TX 77038 > > -----Original Message----- > From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of > rhw > Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 8:50 AM > To: [hidden email] > Subject: Re: awareness > > There cannot be a middle position, because one cannot be in state of being > neither aware nor unaware! I think some would argue that there cannot be > degrees of awareness either: one is either aware or not. This last > sentiment may seem to be pernickety; but some respondents at least would > be thrown by the logical dilemma! > > Richard > > -----Original Message----- > From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of > Eins Bernardo > Sent: 09 January 2009 11:51 > To: [hidden email] > Subject: awareness > > You might be interested to help. Please complete the five point scale on > awareness: > > 5 = very aware > 4 = aware > 3 = ? > 2 = unaware > 1 = very unaware > > You are free to suggest a different "verbal interpretaion" if you wish. > > Thank you. > Eins > > > --------------------------------- > Importing contacts has never been easier.. > Bring your friends over to Yahoo! Mail today! > > ===================== > To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to > [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the > command. To leave the list, send the command > SIGNOFF SPSSX-L > For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command > INFO REFCARD > > ===================== > To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to > [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the > command. To leave the list, send the command > SIGNOFF SPSSX-L > For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command > INFO REFCARD > > ===================== > To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to > [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the > command. To leave the list, send the command > SIGNOFF SPSSX-L > For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command > INFO REFCARD > > > The information transmitted is intended only for the addressee(s) and may > contain confidential or privileged material, or both. Any review, > receipt, dissemination or other use of this information by non-addressees > is prohibited. If you received this in error or are a non-addressee, > please contact the sender and delete the transmitted information. > > ===================== > To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to > [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the > command. To leave the list, send the command > SIGNOFF SPSSX-L > For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command > INFO REFCARD > > ===================== > To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to > [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the > command. To leave the list, send the command > SIGNOFF SPSSX-L > For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command > INFO REFCARD > > ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
«
Return to SPSSX Discussion
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |