|
Dear all,
I want to compare a between subjects factor to a within subjects factor in a repeated measures analysis (i.e., I am interested whether one is significantly more important than the other). Can you please direct me to any references how this can be done in SPSS? THANK YOU! ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
Administrator
|
What do you mean by "more important"?
--
Bruce Weaver bweaver@lakeheadu.ca http://sites.google.com/a/lakeheadu.ca/bweaver/ "When all else fails, RTFM." PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING: 1. My Hotmail account is not monitored regularly. To send me an e-mail, please use the address shown above. 2. The SPSSX Discussion forum on Nabble is no longer linked to the SPSSX-L listserv administered by UGA (https://listserv.uga.edu/). |
|
In reply to this post by sun.sonny71
>> Dear all,
>> >> I want to compare a between subjects factor to a within subjects factor in >> a repeated measures analysis (i.e., I am interested whether one is >> significantly more important than the other). >> >> Can you please direct me to any references how this can be done in SPSS? >> >> THANK YOU! >What do you mean by "more important"? I mean whether one explains significantly more variance than the other (H0: the effect of both factors is the same; H1: one effect is larger than the other). I guess I cannot simply divide the two MS... ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
In reply to this post by sun.sonny71
Think of this as a mixed model with within subjects at level one and between subjects at level two and then estimate he variance components using the mixed procedure. Snijders & Bosker (1999) discuss apportioning variance ar each level.
Snijders T. & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel Analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage. Dr. Paul R. Swank, Professor and Director of Research Children's Learning Institute University of Texas Health Science Center-Houston -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of sun Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 11:07 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: comparing between to within subjects factor Dear all, I want to compare a between subjects factor to a within subjects factor in a repeated measures analysis (i.e., I am interested whether one is significantly more important than the other). Can you please direct me to any references how this can be done in SPSS? THANK YOU! ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
Administrator
|
Here's another book that gives a somewhat gentler introduction (IMO) to multilevel models: Applied Multilevel Analysis: A Practical Guide. Jos WR Twisk. Cambridge University Press, UK 2006, ISBN 100521614989 (PB), ISBN 100521849756 (HB). I found Snijders & Bosker much easier to read after I'd read Twisk's book.
--
Bruce Weaver bweaver@lakeheadu.ca http://sites.google.com/a/lakeheadu.ca/bweaver/ "When all else fails, RTFM." PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING: 1. My Hotmail account is not monitored regularly. To send me an e-mail, please use the address shown above. 2. The SPSSX Discussion forum on Nabble is no longer linked to the SPSSX-L listserv administered by UGA (https://listserv.uga.edu/). |
|
In reply to this post by sun.sonny71
Thank you very much!!! The suggestion to approach it from a mixed model
perspective makes perfect sense to me. However, is there a way I can employ an equality constraint between the effects of the between and within subject factor in SPSS (using mixed models)? E.g., the same product of two companies A and B was rated by 100 people (product = within subjects factor). The raters belong to two different groups (between subjects factor). I want to test whether the total effect of product is significantly different from the effect of group membership. I know how to implement equality constraints between continous predictors in regression analysis, but I am unsure about categorical variables (possibly with more than two levels). It appears to be a simple problem, but somhow I am lost... so any ideas are greatly appreciated! On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 07:12:45 -0700, Bruce Weaver <[hidden email]> wrote: >Swank, Paul R wrote: >> >> Think of this as a mixed model with within subjects at level one and >> between subjects at level two and then estimate he variance components >> using the mixed procedure. Snijders & Bosker (1999) discuss apportioning >> variance ar each level. >> >> Snijders T. & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel Analysis: An introduction to >> basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage. >> >> > >Here's another book that gives a somewhat gentler introduction (IMO) to >multilevel models: > >Applied Multilevel Analysis: A Practical Guide. Jos WR Twisk. Cambridge >University Press, UK 2006, ISBN 100521614989 (PB), ISBN 100521849756 (HB). > >I found Snijders & Bosker much easier to read after I'd read Twisk's book. > > > >----- >-- >Bruce Weaver >[hidden email] >http://sites.google.com/a/lakeheadu.ca/bweaver/ >"When all else fails, RTFM." > >NOTE: My Hotmail account is for posting only, and is not monitored >regularly. >If you wish to send me an e-mail, please use the address shown in my sig >file. >-- >View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/comparing-between-to- >Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >===================== >To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to >[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the >command. To leave the list, send the command >SIGNOFF SPSSX-L >For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command >INFO REFCARD ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
|
Given that the tests of the variance components can be pretty flaky anyway, I'm not sure if I would want to trust a test of the differences. The only way I could think of to approach it might be to use a multilevel SEM program such as Mplus.
Dr. Paul R. Swank, Professor and Director of Research Children's Learning Institute University of Texas Health Science Center-Houston -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of sun Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009 7:16 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: comparing between to within subjects factor Thank you very much!!! The suggestion to approach it from a mixed model perspective makes perfect sense to me. However, is there a way I can employ an equality constraint between the effects of the between and within subject factor in SPSS (using mixed models)? E.g., the same product of two companies A and B was rated by 100 people (product = within subjects factor). The raters belong to two different groups (between subjects factor). I want to test whether the total effect of product is significantly different from the effect of group membership. I know how to implement equality constraints between continous predictors in regression analysis, but I am unsure about categorical variables (possibly with more than two levels). It appears to be a simple problem, but somhow I am lost... so any ideas are greatly appreciated! On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 07:12:45 -0700, Bruce Weaver <[hidden email]> wrote: >Swank, Paul R wrote: >> >> Think of this as a mixed model with within subjects at level one and >> between subjects at level two and then estimate he variance components >> using the mixed procedure. Snijders & Bosker (1999) discuss apportioning >> variance ar each level. >> >> Snijders T. & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel Analysis: An introduction to >> basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage. >> >> > >Here's another book that gives a somewhat gentler introduction (IMO) to >multilevel models: > >Applied Multilevel Analysis: A Practical Guide. Jos WR Twisk. Cambridge >University Press, UK 2006, ISBN 100521614989 (PB), ISBN 100521849756 (HB). > >I found Snijders & Bosker much easier to read after I'd read Twisk's book. > > > >----- >-- >Bruce Weaver >[hidden email] >http://sites.google.com/a/lakeheadu.ca/bweaver/ >"When all else fails, RTFM." > >NOTE: My Hotmail account is for posting only, and is not monitored >regularly. >If you wish to send me an e-mail, please use the address shown in my sig >file. >-- >View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/comparing-between-to- >Sent from the SPSSX Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >===================== >To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to >[hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the >command. To leave the list, send the command >SIGNOFF SPSSX-L >For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command >INFO REFCARD ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
