Hi,
I'm looking at student early literacy scores over five time period for two groups using a repeated measures anova. That's situated. I'm also running independent t-tests at each time period comparing average scores by group. The t-test also gives me whether the variability in the scores is significantly different between the groups at each time period. This will allow me to talk about the spread of scores between the groups. e.g. I would expect the intervention group to have a sd that gets progressive smaller over time on several of the subtests. The question is.... Is there are way to do a group by time test on the standard deviations to see if the intervention group's variability decreases more over time? Thanks, Betty Harris University of Oklahoma E-TEAM http://eteam.ou.edu/ |
Betty,
Specify a linear mixed model (via the MIXED procedure) that allows for group-BY-time heterogeneous residual variances. Then review the output for the R matrix to see whether or not your hypothesis holds up. You could also compare the overall fit of this model to more restrictive models. Ryan On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Harris, Betty A. <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm looking at student early literacy scores over five time period for two > groups using a repeated measures anova. That's situated. > > I'm also running independent t-tests at each time period comparing average > scores by group. The t-test also gives me whether the variability in the > scores is significantly different between the groups at each time period. > This will allow me to talk about the spread of scores between the groups. > e.g. I would expect the intervention group to have a sd that gets > progressive smaller over time on several of the subtests. > > The question is.... Is there are way to do a group by time test on the > standard deviations to see if the intervention group's variability decreases > more over time? > > Thanks, > Betty Harris > University of Oklahoma E-TEAM > http://eteam.ou.edu/ > ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
In reply to this post by Harris, Betty A.
If I measured something like "literacy scores" and expected the improvement
to produce a reduced standard deviation, then I would immediately guess that the given score is *likely* to be the wrong metric for measuring outcome. In particular, I would consider, What happens when I subtract, to get a score from 0 on up of Errors on the test; and then, assuming Poisson as the underlying distribution, I take the square root. Would this yield variances that are much more constant? - That has worked for me, a time or three in the past. These days, it might be more conventional that, after reversing scores so that Errors are counted (minimum, zero), someone would use a Poisson link function. -- Rich Ulrich Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 16:19:27 +0000 From: [hidden email] Subject: group by time test for variability? To: [hidden email] Hi, I'm looking at student early literacy scores over five time period for two groups using a repeated measures anova. That's situated. I'm also running independent t-tests at each time period comparing average scores by group. The t-test also gives me whether the variability in the scores is significantly different between the groups at each time period. This will allow me to talk about the spread of scores between the groups. e.g. I would expect the intervention group to have a sd that gets progressive smaller over time on several of the subtests. The question is.... Is there are way to do a group by time test on the standard deviations to see if the intervention group's variability decreases more over time? |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |