Dear list: Below is a crosstabs output and includes subscript letters which is new Feature in spss. Compare column proportions which is presented in the Cell Display tab. If I look at Column Y 1 and read down the percent we have 62.5% and 37.5% and then for Column Y 2 we have 25% and 75% but the subscripts for Column 1 Y are all a’s and for Column 2 Y the Subscripts are all b’s. So does this mean that 62.5% is sign. Different from 25.0% and that 37.5% Is sign. Different from 75%. ??
Martin F. Sherman, Ph.D. Professor of Psychology Director of Masters Education in Psychology: Thesis Track Loyola University Maryland Department of Psychology 222 B Beatty Hall 4501 North Charles Street Baltimore, MD 21210 410-617-2417 |
My question is basic. If a data set of around 300 is normally distributed is it reasonable to use chi square tests and t-tests for different aspects of analysis. I have suggested that for consistency, only one approach should be followed ie parametric or non-parametric but not both. I would appreciate any comments and advice on this. Sorry I forgot to change the subject line Rod |
In reply to this post by msherman
This is an old fashioned and counterproductive format Many people will want the numbers directly into spreadsheet. Its a pain to remove subscripts So a SEPARATE column for the subscripts a, b et would be a very useful option. This problem also occurs in CORRELATION, where, sensibly there is option NOT to include superscripts for significance. So strong recommendation, options: Option a. Numbers should be numbers ONLY. Footnote subscripts and superscripts should have column to themselves. Option b. Current ghastly format, [still liked by some journals] so many will want to copy the SPSS tables direct into word-processor. Best Diana ____________________________________________ Professor Diana Kornbrotemail: d.e.kornbrot@... web: http://web.me.com/kornbrot/KornbrotHome.html Work School of Psychology University of Hertfordshire College Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9AB, UK voice: +44 (0) 170 728 4626 Home 19 Elmhurst Avenue London N2 0LT, UK voice: +44 (0) 208 444 2081 mobile: +44 (0) 7403 18 16 12 From: Martin Sherman <[hidden email]> Reply-To: Martin Sherman <[hidden email]> Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 22:21:07 +0100 To: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]> Subject: new option in crosstabs- comparing column proportions Dear list: Below is a crosstabs output and includes subscript letters which is new Feature in spss. Compare column proportions which is presented in the Cell Display tab. If I look at Column Y 1 and read down the percent we have 62.5% and 37.5% and then for Column Y 2 we have 25% and 75% but the subscripts for Column 1 Y are all a’s and for Column 2 Y the Subscripts are all b’s. So does this mean that 62.5% is sign. Different from 25.0% and that 37.5% Is sign. Different from 75%. ??
Martin F. Sherman, Ph.D. Professor of Psychology Director of Masters Education in Psychology: Thesis Track Loyola University Maryland Department of Psychology 222 B Beatty Hall 4501 North Charles Street Baltimore, MD 21210 410-617-2417 |
In reply to this post by x p
Why wouldn't the statistical test follow from the question you
wanted to answer given the data that you have?
Gene Maguin From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of x p Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 8:34 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: non-parametric and parametric tests together My question is basic. If a data set of around 300 is normally
distributed is it reasonable to use chi square tests and t-tests for different
aspects of analysis. I have suggested that for consistency, only one approach
should be followed ie parametric or non-parametric but not both. I would
appreciate any comments and advice on this.
Sorry I forgot to change the subject line
Rod
|
In reply to this post by msherman
Hello list, I haven’t seen an answer to this question. The footnote in the output is a bit ambiguous, but the online help gives a clear example: http://127.0.0.1:56507/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.spss.statistics.help/syn_crosstabs.htm (look at the cells subcommand). I have another remark about the same topic. The syntax allows for /cells prob and /cells bprop. Bprop uses the Bonferoni adjustment, while /prop doesn’t. In the output however, it is not made clear if the adjustment has been made. By the way: you can specify both, i.e. “ /cells prop bprop” without SPSS complaining (SPSS seems more tolerant then statisticians J) but nevertheless the program only gives one pair of subscripts and it remains unclear if the result is Bonferoni adjusted or not. Antoon Smulders Van: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] Namens Martin Sherman Dear list: Below is a crosstabs output and includes subscript letters which is new Feature in spss. Compare column proportions which is presented in the Cell Display tab. If I look at Column Y 1 and read down the percent we have 62.5% and 37.5% and then for Column Y 2 we have 25% and 75% but the subscripts for Column 1 Y are all a’s and for Column 2 Y the Subscripts are all b’s. So does this mean that 62.5% is sign. Different from 25.0% and that 37.5% Is sign. Different from 75%. ??
Martin F. Sherman, Ph.D. Professor of Psychology Director of Masters Education in Psychology: Thesis Track Loyola University Maryland Department of Psychology 222 B Beatty Hall 4501 North Charles Street Baltimore, MD 21210 410-617-2417 |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |