Hi,
my SPSS-file consists of rows and columns (obviously). every row is a subject and every column is a variable. my subjects can be divided in 2 groups. i have 3 variables that belong to a "region" such that my table looks like: region1_var1 region1_var2 region1_var3 region2_var1 region2_var2 ...etc. subject1 subject2 subject3 . . . etc. i thus have a between-subjects factor: group and (i think) 1 within-subjects factor: region. i would like to do a test that tests whether there is an effect of region for my 2 groups. this test -if significant- may allow me to 'post-hoc'-assess the regions separately. can this be done using the Repeated Measures analysis under the General Linear Model? thanks, -joost ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
Joost,
It may be just how you named your variables and my assumption that 'subjects' are persons but I'm having difficulty understanding how you have a repeated measures design. I don't understand what is repeated. Is var1, var2 and var3 the repeated element within a region or is region1, region2, etc the repeated element for var1. Perhaps somebody else understands this better than I do. Gene Maguin -----Original Message----- From: SPSSX(r) Discussion [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of joost Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 11:29 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: question Hi, my SPSS-file consists of rows and columns (obviously). every row is a subject and every column is a variable. my subjects can be divided in 2 groups. i have 3 variables that belong to a "region" such that my table looks like: region1_var1 region1_var2 region1_var3 region2_var1 region2_var2 ...etc. subject1 subject2 subject3 . . . etc. i thus have a between-subjects factor: group and (i think) 1 within-subjects factor: region. i would like to do a test that tests whether there is an effect of region for my 2 groups. this test -if significant- may allow me to 'post-hoc'-assess the regions separately. can this be done using the Repeated Measures analysis under the General Linear Model? thanks, -joost ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD ===================== To manage your subscription to SPSSX-L, send a message to [hidden email] (not to SPSSX-L), with no body text except the command. To leave the list, send the command SIGNOFF SPSSX-L For a list of commands to manage subscriptions, send the command INFO REFCARD |
Administrator
|
Typically my brain processes region as living location. Region as a within subject variable therefore is an alien concept. I contend that Joost needs to better explain what his/her data are if anyone is likely to be of help aside from making ESPeculations!
Please reply to the list and not to my personal email.
Those desiring my consulting or training services please feel free to email me. --- "Nolite dare sanctum canibus neque mittatis margaritas vestras ante porcos ne forte conculcent eas pedibus suis." Cum es damnatorum possederunt porcos iens ut salire off sanguinum cliff in abyssum?" |
In reply to this post by joost
As I read it, potentially, you have two within factors.
According to your example, for each Region (I think of, Brain-region), you have 3 variables. The number of Regions is not stated. You can have a simple repeated measures for one factor, Regions, if you analyze each variable separately. Post-hoc tests for repeated measures are best performed as paired t-tests; and you make your own adjustments after the test. Certain stat-packages have offered analogs to HST, etc., for post-hocs, but they have tough assumptions. If you know enough to justify using them, you won't be asking here. If the 3 variables are "the same variable in three locations" then you have a doubly-repeated measures, if you want to analyze them together. If the 3 variables are various, then you have MANOVA design. That one will be, most likely, extremely difficult to make good sense of, and it is probably something to avoid. -- Rich Ulrich > Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:29:15 -0400 > From: [hidden email] > Subject: question > To: [hidden email] > > Hi, > > my SPSS-file consists of rows and columns (obviously). every row is a > subject and every column is a variable. my subjects can be divided in 2 > groups. i have 3 variables that belong to a "region" such that my table > looks like: > > region1_var1 region1_var2 region1_var3 region2_var1 region2_var2 ...etc. > subject1 > subject2 > subject3 > . > . > . > etc. > > i thus have a between-subjects factor: group and (i think) 1 within-subjects > factor: region. > > i would like to do a test that tests whether there is an effect of region > for my 2 groups. this test -if significant- may allow me to > 'post-hoc'-assess the regions separately. can this be done using the > Repeated Measures analysis under the General Linear Model? > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |